Project Kuiper: Amazon’s answer to SpaceX’s Starlink passes ‘crucial’ test::Amazon’s Project Kuiper, which uses optical inter-satellite link (OISL) technology to connect more than 3,000 satellites in a mesh network that blankets Earth, just cleared a final hurdle needed to launch next year.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why give poor people cheap, reliable, fast hardwired access to information when you can give them expensive unreliable satellite access to information.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What happens when China and Russia send up their own constellations? How many companies and governments are allowed to launch their own? Every new constellation significantly increases the chances of a kessler syndrome in LEO, for minimal gain, beyond maybe 2 for redundancy.

      • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is no real danger of Kessler syndrome because these satellites burn up in the atmosphere after a few years anyways.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        There are reasons to be concerned about the situation. Kessler syndrome is not one of them, not in LEO

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s LEO. If they shut off navigation tomorrow, they’d all be falling cinders in a year.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’d like to hope that in a few years when we collectively decide this was a bad idea we can start hitting them with lasers and ablatively decelerating them to burn up in the atmosphere.

      I mean I don’t have a lot of hope for that, but call it a wistful fantasy.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d like to hope that in a few years when we collectively decide this was a bad idea we can start hitting them with lasers and ablatively decelerating them to burn up in the atmosphere.

        If we do nothing at all they’ll burn up in 3-5 years anyway. Starlink operates in a very low orbit. Thats one of the reasons there have to be so many of them. A higher orbit (like MEO instead of LEO) would mean fewer needed satellites for the same level of coverage of the Earth.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I want to SHOOT THEM DOWN. Send a FUCKING MESSAGE.

          (I know you’re right I’m just a cranky pants)

  • wulf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Call me a socialist, but the moment the tech was proven either the US or some UN based org should have eminent domained and brought Starlink.

    That way there wouldn’t be multiple companies sending tens of thousands of satellites into space. And hypothetically there would be a greater expectation of equal access. Oh and access wouldn’t be at the whim of a pretty billionaire.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Call me a socialist, but the moment the tech was proven either the US or some UN based org should have eminent domained and brought Starlink.

      That would have had a functional constellation for about 4 years or so. Without constantly launching new satellites, the constellation would degrade to uselessness. Who’s going to buy the rockets and replacement satellites and keep launching replacements?

      • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Who? If it’s not either profitable or has a distinct benefit, then it does not deserve to exist.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Amazon’s Project Kuiper, which uses optical inter-satellite link (OISL) technology to connect more than 3,000 satellites in a mesh network that blankets Earth, just cleared a final hurdle needed to launch next year.

    Similar to SpaceX’s Starlink, Project Kuiper is Amazon’s plan to provide high-speed internet by launching and connecting 3,236 satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO).

    The firm launched two prototype satellites in October and began testing the systems required for the network to operate.

    One key test was validating the optical inter-satellite link (OISL) technology, which uses infrared lasers to send data between the spacecraft.

    Currently, Earthbound optical fiber cables power high-speed internet services by using light to transmit data over great distances.

    Amazon plans for Project Kuiper to offer speeds of up to 400 megabits per second for most consumers when fully deployed in 2029.


    The original article contains 424 words, the summary contains 138 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ah fuck no, can we please stop polluting our low earth orbit with this trash? All of this is a bad idea, bad execution, and there are much better alternatives available

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Given that these low orbit spacecraft only last a few years before they deorbit, I wonder how long this incredibly expensive and climate destructive industry will last. Most industries try for low cost of ownership while this one seems to built in high maintenance.