• Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, if it were me I’d isolate the copyrighted assets in a way that makes them really easy to add or remove, remove them from the official distribution, then plop a tarball and an install script of some sort onto all the most common piracy outlets. If people want it, they’ll find it and legally I’m not liable because I’m just distributing a mod that has a place where you can put copyrighted assets

  • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    It already was legally distinct since it wasn’t made by the company behind pal world.

    Go ahead and try to explain it using copyright and trademark laws all you want, but I don’t understand how a MOD that isn’t backed by a company can be arbitrarily blocked by another company.

    Nintendo is cancer whether they make good games or not.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can’t use Nintendo’s characters. Mods are not exempt just because they’re mods.

      Not sure exactly what part of this is so hard to understand.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re talking to the generation that puts entire episodes of tv shows on YouTube then writes “no copyright infringement intended”

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It already was legally distinct since it wasn’t made by the company behind pal world.

      That’s not the issue, or what that means here. “Legally distinct” in this context would mean that the product isn’t infringing on the IP, copyright, or trademark of a similar product. “Yellow rat” is fine, “Pikachu” is not.

      Go ahead and try to explain it using copyright and trademark laws all you want, but I don’t understand how a MOD that isn’t backed by a company can be arbitrarily blocked by another company.

      If someone ripped a verse or a chorus from a song, and uploaded it to Spotify, you don’t think that Universal could contact Spotify to take it down or block it?

      • bluespin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Mods are free and community-driven. This situation is closer to someone using the chorus to a song in their own soundcloud track, which in my opinion should be completely fine

          • bluespin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not familiar with soundcloud’s TOS, which is why I noted that it’s my opinion. When did people decide it’s alright for multi-billion dollar corporations to dictate what people create for fun?

            • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              It has nothing to do with anyone’s TOS.

              People decided that when they passed copyright laws and signed international treaties about it.

        • Zeke@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          IIRC, the mod wasn’t free. They were making money off of it using Patreon.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ignoring that this mod wasn’t free, that’s absolutely not in the neighborhood of legal.

          Nintendo is fully within their legal rights to send a DMCA takedown to every single fan drawing of Pikachu on the planet if they so desire. It belongs to them.

    • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nintendo is cancer. Few companies hate their customers as much as Nintendo (Capcom, I’m looking at you). If you want to have a smash brothers tournament, Nintendo will shut you down.

      Can we get away with calling it something like a “Touch Fellows Tournament”?

      I’m open to better names.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Using someone else’s copyrighted assets or a facsimile there of is still a violation of copyright whether it’s free or not. It being a mod makes no difference. It being free makes no difference. The only way it could be considered fair use is if it was kept for personal, private use by the creator.

    • Saint_Bandit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because the guy had a Patreon charging for the mod. He was profiting from their IP, there are pokemon mods for hundreds of games and hundreds of fan made pokemon games that exist because they don’t charge for them.