I am so tired of the whole “cool pope” thing with Francis. It’s 100% PR.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It also helps LBGT couples who can’t have children get them. I don’t see an issue even if there is money involved if it is clearly not coerced.

    • DontTakeMySky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t know how I feel about it overall (surrogacy, not gay people getting to have children, that’s beautiful), but it’s hard to be confident there’s no coercion when money is involved. The money itself can be coercive especially if the surrogate is particularly in need of the money. I’m not sure it can always be “clear” it’s not coerced.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        In the U.S., where medical care is expensive, I think money to cover that should be expected.

        • DontTakeMySky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Absolutely! And more to cover other expenses like maternity clothing, any comfort items to manage the pregnancy, additional dietary needs, and probably some more to help account for how traumatic a pregnancy can be and the body changes it causes.

          I’m absolutely not advocating that a surrogate shouldn’t get paid. Just that it’s hard to separate payment from coercion in even the best situations.