• Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 month ago

    Where is my shocked face? I mean, who didn’t know he was a tRump operative the WHOLE time. This shit is so desperate. They are just trying everything other than you know…governing for the people.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the Kennedy campaign dropped out, Shanahan said she’d consider running for governor of California.

  • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean he always was supposed to be the spoiler candidate to bleed votes of the dems, but seems that lately they are, if anything bleeding votes of the reps, so their donors are probably redirecting them.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    The fact that her name isn’t prevalent enough for the headline vs. “RFK Jr. Running Mate” tells me this won’t matter.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll be honest, I’ve never heard of her and had no idea Mr Brainworms had a running mate. He was irrelevant, I’ve seen one sign for him and I thought it was a joke. (it still could be, idk)

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I get the appeal of Trump. I don’t like it and can’t fathom being the kind of person who would vote for him, but I understand why people vote for him.

    I don’t get Kennedy at all. Is it purely Q people still thinking he is the next savior or some shit?

    • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump may flirt with anti-vaxx sentiment or climate denial, etc., but he can’t fully support those ideas. They’re very niche and he’d lose the centre if he did.

      RFK Jr doesn’t hold back on those issues. For conspiracy types he is closer to their beliefs than Trump.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The appeal of Trump? He’s a loudmouthed asshole. That’s appealing to other loudmouthed assholes

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      1 month ago

      Kennedy has been a Democrat most of his life. He helped Obama & supported Hillary. He’s definitely done some weird things, but most Democrats would have called him an ally up until his presidential run. Trump has always been a con man. If you get why people support Trump more than why they’d support Kennedy, then I’d say that says more about you than him.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        He’s definitely done some weird things, but most Democrats would have called him an ally up until his presidential run.

        Bullshit. He was vocally antivax. People who didn’t know that before sure found out during COVID.

        Also, people consider someone less of an ally when they find out about things like the dead bear and the brain worms.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 month ago

          He has a body count. He used his celebrity to get the MMR vax paused in Samoa and kids died from a measles outbreak. It turned out the kids who’d died after getting vaxxed were poisoned by poorly-prepared vaxes rather than the vax itself. He takes no responsibility for this.

        • Chocrates@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Person you are replying to may be referring to decades ago. I think the country’s brain broke in the last decade

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 month ago

          Weird… why did the Biden campaign enlist Robert De Niro to help with events? Does that mean Biden was antivax, and that Kamala said she loves an antivaxer during the first day of the DNC convention?

          Also… leaving a dead bear that someone hit with their vehicle in a park is messed up, but sending weapons to a country that has killed 30k+ women & children is normal?

          Last, you do realize brain worms is like a serious medical condition? Like… should Democrats now platform on being disabled or a paraplegic disbars them from being an ally?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Is Robert DeNiro an antivaxxer?

            And are you actually accusing Democrats of ableism because they don’t trust a guy who had WORMS IN HIS BRAIN to be in politics?

            • John Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes Robert DeNiro was alongside RFK Jr at his vaccine safety press event offering money to show it was safe to inject mercury utilized in many vaccines at the time.

              And yes it is ableism. Why does it matter that he had worms? Biden has had multiple brain surgeries due to aneurisms.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Would you say it was ableism to not trust someone with Alzheimer’s too? It’s a disability after all. Should someone with Alzheimer’s be considered an important political ally?

          • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Look, there’s a reason why people who use wheelchairs aren’t running track events. Disability is a spectrum, but let’s not pretend that it doesn’t actually prevent people from doing things.

      • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Since he went all in on antivax and conspiracy stuff, Dems have known he’s a weird/crazy dude. Which is a damn shame, as pre-brain worms, he was a kick-ass environmental lawyer. Dude is clearly not all there and hasn’t been for decades.

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          He attended the vaccination safety events Robert De Niro… who the Biden campaign then enlisted. I’m not saying he’s right by any means. I think it is fine to question vaccine safety, especially when big pharma has so much influence in politics, but obviously he’s made statements that were far too extreme without supporting medical evidence.

          Regardless… Christians believing in make believe stuff that would normally be considered mental illness is as conspiracy-based to me as RFK Jr, so by all means if you think that saying crazy shit means you can never be an ally… then I guess you’ve never ran for state government.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 month ago

              And it’s apparently ableism to say that the brain worms make him someone who maybe shouldn’t be listened to.

              • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 month ago

                He said his brainwork was affecting his ability to make money to pay his x wife alimony.

                I’d think that would make running the United States pretty difficult too, but maybe it’s easier than everyone thinks.

            • John Richard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              1 month ago

              Does that mean you’re pro-genocide? Why the hyperbole? Why so offended when someone speaks truth?

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t think anyone stupid enough to vote for RFK could find the door out of their house to actually get to a polling booth. The net effect will be zero.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago
    Mediaite - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Mediaite:

    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.mediaite.com/podcasts/rfk-jr-running-mate-reveals-theyre-considering-dropping-out-to-join-forces-with-trump-and-block-harris/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 month ago

    I get why Kamala wouldn’t want him in the administration, but did she even consider it? Like… his housing policy wasn’t bad. Let’s say he brought 3% more voters. That could have been significant. 3% could definitely help beat Kamala with a race this close. I don’t like the guy… and honestly, despite it not being his fault I just can’t stand listening to him speak. I’m wondering now if Trump is actually going to kick JD to the curb.

    • zelifcam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s something wrong with him. Clearly any sane person would avoid that situation.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      3% is basically the lizardman constant. You can’t assume that voters will so readily jump from one candidate to the other.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        3% is significant. He had like 8 or 9% prior to Biden dropping out. I know he can’t sway all his voters and so that is why I suggested maybe 3%.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      He potentially could’ve caused LOST votes if she took him in. He is very unpopular.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I guess… its a possibility, but very unlikely that Democrats would vote for Trump cause she was having conversations with him. Democrats talk to Republicans all the time and don’t lose votes. Sometimes you have to even work with people you don’t agree with… Imagine that.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They are nakedly admitting that they will drop out because they are inexplicably pulling more GOP votes than DNC votes.

      There’s two options that we’re looking at,” she said. “One is staying in, forming that new party; but we run the risk of a Kamala Harris and Walz presidency because we draw votes from Trump. We draw, somehow, more votes from Trump.

      “Or we walk away right now and join forces with Donald Trump; and we walk away from that and we explain to our base why we’re making this decision… Not an easy decision.”

      The fact that they were very clearly running to spoil Dems is a good reason not to offer them powerful positions in a Harris admin.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Think more down the line. Having a 3% middle man would be rather annoying, because whatever the other parties come up with needs to be approved by the 3% over and over, to make a majority, making the 3% the most powerful position.