Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) single-handedly raised the stakes of the 2024 elections on Tuesday, revealing he’d consider carving out rare exceptions to allow votes on protecting voting and abortion rights.

Schumer’s plan would move the Senate closer to getting rid of the filibuster, a longtime rule that requires 60 votes instead of a simple 50 vote majority to advance legislation.

    • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      He can’t, as this is an ideological split between the parties and would need to go through the house as well, where it would fail. Bringing this up now helps inform voters of an issue that could be resolved if Democrats turn out and take control of the house while retaining control of the Senate and executive branch.

      • darvocet@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s more about getting the republicans on record with a vote on a clean bill. Hard to campaign when you voted no on voting rights.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Especially if it forces GOPers to vote against rape, viability and incest exceptions. Getting those fucks on record about that would be awesome.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m highly skeptical that anyone in the GOP would a) have trouble crafting a campaign message that trashes an ostensibly “clean” bill or b) lose any support over a vote either way. Anyone who cares about abortion or voting rights is already voting blue, and anyone who’s voting red at this point won’t care about this procedural tactic. We’ve been hammering Dems to get GOP votes “on the record” for decades, and it hasn’t really been the factor that moved the needle in any meaningful way.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Showing the Dems will actually do something would motivate the apathetic people. It isn’t about swaying existing voters, it is about increasing the number of people who vote by giving them something to vote for.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If if if if if if.

        I don’t buy for a second that he will ditch the filibuster if the Dems have control. They could get rid of it right now and they would be no worse off than when the Republicans have the house, senate, and oval office and choose to ditch it to pass their project 2025 bullshit like they neutered it to stack the courts.

        Ditching the filibuster, passing the legislation, and then blaming the house for not following through should dominate the election discussion.