WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden said Friday he’ll give a second go at his student debt relief plan, rooting it in the Higher Education Act, after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against his initial plan to forgive up to $20,000 per borrower.

“I believe the court’s decision was a mistake, it was wrong,” Biden said, speaking from the White House. “We need to find a new way and we’re moving as fast as we can.”

The Supreme Court ruled Friday in a 6-3 decision against Biden‘s plan to cancel up to student loan debt for an estimated 40 million Americans. The venture would have forgiven more than $400 billion in student loan debt, making it one of the most expensive executive actions in history.

Biden pointed to the greenlighting of the Paycheck Protection Program under former President Donald Trump, which cost an estimated $760 billion.

“The hypocrisy is stunning,” Biden said. “You can’t help a family making $75,000 a year but you can help a billionaire and have your debt forgiven? My plan would not only have been life changing for millions of Americans, it would have been good for the American economy.”

Biden said Friday he also has directed the U.S. Department of Education to institute a 12-month “on-ramp” period that would grant borrowers struggling to adjust to repayments after the three-year pause forgiveness for missing initial payments.

Biden stressed it is not an extension of the pause as payments will still be due and interest will accrue, but the Department of Education would not report failure to make payments to credit agencies for the first year.

Last summer, Biden announced his plan to cancel $10,000 in student debt for borrowers earning less than $125,000, or married couples earning under $250,000. Pell grant recipients were eligible for up to $20,000 in forgiveness under the proposal.

The Supreme Court ruling Friday places millions of student loan borrowers back at square one as the payments pause instituted at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic comes to a close in October. During the pause, implemented under the Trump administration, borrowers did not have to make payments on their loans nor did the loans accrue interest. source

  • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really don’t think anything will be done. If it is, it’ll be another plan mentioned in campaign promises.

    Sigh. While I can afford my payments and will happily pay mine off, I know there are many who can’t and pulling the rug out from Americans when businesses and rich constantly get handouts or freebies is so frustrating.

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If he believed that, then he should ignore the ruling and forgive the debt.

  • ThatGirlKylie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that you could have made up a fake business, received a PPP loan, paid off your student loan debt, then had your PPP loan forgiven is absolutely astounding and I’m pretty certain that many people who DID get PPP loans did just that and paid off other debts. Because we sure as hell didn’t get it down here as grunt workers.

    Eat the rich, I’m so tired of being fucking poor.

  • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He has the authority to cancel all student loans but was a coward and decided to not pull the trigger so now here we are with his covid based plan being struck down by the court.

    Here’s hoping he actually does use his actual authority to make it happen

    • Sprinkled3450@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you please explain it to me like a five year old? The way I understand it is that the cancellation basically means that the federal govt will take on the debt - which amounts to spending. Spending is decided on by the Congress and not the Executive. Having said that, everything could in theory be all good until someone files a lawsuit against the action, which in this case someone did. Am I understanding it correctly?

      • featured@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t necessarily have to spend a dime, seeing how the government is providing these loans. It would amount to not getting paid back, but they already spent the money when they sent out the loans. So it costs nothing to say hey just don’t pay us back