You must log in or register to comment.
LLM != intelligence.
Is that you’re opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?
It’s fact.
In your opinion.
In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.
That’s why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.
It’s not my opinion, it’s fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I’ve built a few of them. It isn’t intelligence. That’s not refutable.
Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you’ve built both, you should know that.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
