next week on trumpjunk.loser, a $179.99 limited edition plushy of a rat with a detachable head.
(like ozzy’s bat from a few years back)
next week on trumpjunk.loser, a $179.99 limited edition plushy of a rat with a detachable head.
(like ozzy’s bat from a few years back)
they feel safe in a box, plus a small box lets them curl up into a little ball, keeps their (naturally warmer than ours) bodies warm.
there was a recall a while back for those. one store here just closed out an entire freezer section of stock that was older (not affected) by it… i guess no one was buying it at the time because of the news reports.
50c a bag. i filled my (too small of a) freezer. only half a bag left.
no shame. no regrets.
this WILL show up on russian tv where they claim americans are part of the ‘invasion force’.
whatever their ‘worst nightmares’ are, are more than likely just what we need, and what most of us actually want.
not just the house, but senate too. democrats not only need to take a few seats (or more) from republicans but also keep the ~ 20 they already have (that are up this go-around).
… and state races, and local races. it all matters!
probably not very many because it only took a single psychotic new owner to do that when he started pulling servers out of a sacramento data center a couple years back, with no engineering and no planning.
remember when elon just started yanking out servers and twitter had a sustained months-long meltdown?
and most every cpanel (and every other web host panel) box on the planet.
web, ftp, database, mail, dns, and more. all on one machine.
not just store fronts. the walk-up flat next door to me in a small building (and only vacant one) has been ‘on the market’ and ready for move-in for over eight months… at 3.5x what the rents were jan 2020. the greedy bastard just won’t take less and he’s willing to leave it empty until he gets what he wants.
if google cared, they’d vet ads and ad links, and guarantee their safety and security.
if google cared, they’d put a stop to seo ‘optimizers’ and scammers scoring top positions on serps.
but google doesn’t care about anything other than their profits and share price.
adblockers can affect both of those. they’re using the weak cover of ‘security’ enhancement to neuter them.
existing adblockers provide more safety and security than what can be realized by the shift to mv3.
i mostly use a vivaldi or opera portable for those. unzip, run, use the temperamental site, close, delete directory. it’s not very often that i have to do this.
but for a couple of pesky sites i do frequent a bit more often, i keep their portable browsers to reuse and have them configured (including addons) specifically for them.
i did read somewhere that affected chrome users are being presented with alternatives from the chrome extension ‘store’ that are mv3-ready.
whether or not they’re capable of clicking the right buttons on the right screens and windows to do it is another story.
ubo, abp and adguard all have mv3 variants. there are others, but i think those are the ‘big three’. ublock origin lite is what i’ve been moving people to here, if not to firefox. so far, so good.
dns blocking methods do not, and literally cannot, block them all.
we got a second area code on top of our existing one and had to start 10-digit dialing something like 15 years ago.
to this day i have yet to encounter anyone with a phone number in that new area code. even the scammers that spoof their cid don’t use that new area code.
before the switch we could 7-digit dial for 40 miles around us, even across an area code boundary. and, tbh i’d rather have had to switch to a new area code and kept the 7 digit dialing than have to deal with the 10 digit bullshit. it just seems so out of place here in the boonies, hours away from, well, pretty much everything.
that is the white portion of the diagram.
they probably already are, and they’re still getting played by reality and facts.
yes, it will.
whether or not a ‘fully functional’ and fully-featured content blocker remains available for third-party browsers that use chromium as their core will depend on those third-parties and what they add, or add back, to their own releases to support those kinds of browser extensions.
or, they’re using them up as fast as they can be produced.
some way to call a custom or ‘third party’ (not compiled into the program) extractor would probably be enough. then let other people work on ones for the, um, ‘problem sites’.