Personally I believe that it’ll make people associate the Fediverse with Threads, which is not a good thing. Edit: It’ll replace their definition of the Fediverse, with Threads, and people may widely forget about Mastodon, Lemmy, Kbin etc.

  • Ignacio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering that the big majority of Threads’ users are cringe influencers, brands that are ads themselves, and celebrities who don’t want to interact with anybody but their bootlickers (who are also celebrities), I would say it’s detrimental to the fediverse.

    • NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re judging the platform based on the earliest of early adopters. Yes, people with nothing to lose and everything to gain by being on the ground floor of the platform have joined, but general adoption will take a little while. It will grow and normalize. They do have an uphill battle convincing people to leave Twitter, and frankly, ActivityPub isn’t a big selling point. Being able to talk to nerds who left Twitter and Reddit isn’t going to drive the average Instagram user or current average Twitter user to a platform - or else they’d be here. Yes, that’s the side many of us know, but we are not average users.

      • Yes, people with nothing to lose and everything to gain by being on the ground floor of the platform have joined, but general adoption will take a little while. It will grow and normalize.

        So the folks who decide to leave the latest dumpster fire of a mismanaged tech company that shits all over its users (Twitter/Reddit) to intentionally choose to move to a company that has been shitting all over its users (and worse) for years and years, are going to be the ones that will make Threads better, and that we should eventually hope to federate with? Am I reading you right?