The case will test how far the court’s conservative majority is willing to go in interpreting the scope of its 2022 ruling that expanded gun rights outside the home.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday indicated it would uphold a federal law that prohibits people under domestic violence restraining orders from owning firearms, potentially limiting the scope of its own major gun rights ruling from last year.

The case gives the court’s 6-3 conservative majority a chance to consider the broad ramifications of the 2022 decision, which for the first time found that there is a right to bear arms outside the home under the Constitution’s Second Amendment.

  • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean? One has to be put in motion and surely there are records of such, how would an “authority figure” know if you violated one if there wasn’t?

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think restraining orders, at least temporary ones, have a low threshold. Basically an unsubstantiated accusation is enough.

      It’s supposed to be to protect the vulnerable, but can also be abused. Domestic abuse is complicated, and often comes down to “he said she said” muddy water without much provable fact.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But wait, @ysjet says that that’s a bad narrative and it never happens, is it possible he or she has no idea what they’re talking about?