• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Requiring skill doesn’t make it “skilled labour”, though. The phrase means more than “labour that requires something that meets the definition of skill”.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Investopedia has a definiton.. It seems to provide a breakdown of a lot of related terms.

        I also would make the argument that not everything that needs to be learned should be described as “skilled”.

        Saying the word “the” needs to be learned. I wouldn’t describe saying “the” as “skilled”.

        • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What is your intention from “should”?

          From your suggestion, whose interests are being protected, and whose harmed?

          Why should anyone in particular dominate the process of establishing usages?

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why should anyone in particular dominate the process of establishing usages?

            Why should you be the one who defines skilled labour?

            What benefit is there to collapsing the definitions of unskilled, semi-skilled, and highly skilled labour into skilled labour?

            • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              How have I expressed the intention you have attributed to me?

              I asked why anyone should dominate.