What club signing made you pissed off that has or haven’t worked out

    • LondonDude123@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah to be fair he looked good for Leicester in the midfield with Kante. Now we know it was ALL Kante

      • thugmuffin22@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Certainly think Kante was doing the heavy lifting, but you don’t play midfield for a side that wins the Premier League if only one guy is doing everything. Give him a tiny bit of credit at least

        • taylorstillsays@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like this argument holds true for every player in history except for Kante. Genuinely think Leicester would have won the league with any upper-mid table deep lying midfielder who was having a consistent season.

    • mindpainters@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always looked at it as a package deal price with kante. And even if you combine both transfer fees it’s still a good deal for kante alone.

    • GlennSWFC@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sidwell to Chelsea, Parker to Chelsea, Barkley to Chelsea, Wright-Phillips to Chelsea…

      I know the homegrown player quota is vital for some teams to actually have any homegrown players at all in their squad, but Chelsea (and City with Rodwell & Phillips) have stagnated a fair few careers with it.