• nidas321@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    They didn’t just disagree with the majority they disagreed with the rule book.

    Violent Conduct /…/ In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with their hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

    That combined with the “he’s already made an action towards the ball” which is nowhere to be found in the rule book, not based on any precedent, and complete nonsense. Shows that this panel is judging on vibes only and shouldn’t be taken seriously.