• TheLimeyLemmon@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there any reason this rule wouldn’t get voted through? Besides a few obvious clubs who’d vote against it, this should be a straightforward rule change.

    • CrossXFir3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk, you need 14 to pass a rule change right? Well City and Newcastle are obvious. Utd might vote against it because Ratcliffe might want an Ineos sponorship. Maybe Evertons new shady owners want to do some fuckery. We never know what Chelsea wants to do. It could be closer than you think.