VAR is not the problem

The issue is those who are using video assistance and making decisions without any common sense. This is a referee problem.

The incompetence at this level of the game is bad for European Football. The referees always get away with it with no repercussions. The players, the managers & the clubs will pay for their mistakes while these referees just move on to the next match.

Until the referees are held accountable for their decisions this sport is not enjoyable to watch anymore. If they find the job difficult then find someone who is capable of doing the job.

The state of refereeing now is so so bad that I t might not even be wild to speculate that this seems to be a planned execution by the referees association to discredit the use of video assistance, so the game will go back to being played the old way where their decision is the final and they don’t have to refer to a third party.

How difficult can it be to make a decision with the help of VAR ? It has to be such a useful a tool. It makes no sense as to why it’s being implemented so poorly.

I honestly would be in full support of AI to replace these humans who seem completely incapable of using their common sense.

It’s hard to justify talking time to watch this sport when someone’s lack of common sense can completely ruin the competition & fun in football.

  • nick2k23@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nope it’s fine, it’s the morons using said technology that are the problem

    • Retinion@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not fine. There’s plenty of examples of VAR as a system failing.

      Saka v Liverpool, no camera angle to see an offside in the middle of the pitch.

      Newcastle Arsenal last weekend was a calamity of errors that were all “inconclusive” largely due to a lack of camera angles.

      Sheffield Villa - Goal line technology and VAR failed on a goal check to see if the ball went over the line

      Martinelli Brighton - offside check given against him, no “conclusive” evidence he was onside, goal disallowed.

      That’s just off the top of my head, 4 errors 3 of which are relate to my own team, all of which are failings of the actual VAR system (as well as referees possibly) , so I presume there’s similar for each team.

    • PandiBong@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I have been saying it’s the refs not VAR, if you listen to the VAR review of the Newcastle vs arsenal goal that PGMOL just released, its a hilarious cacophony of ineptitude, but most of all - three decisions aren’t made because of lack of camera angles. Seriously. So the tech is clearly also a problem (in the PL anyway)

      • HEELinKayfabe@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean you’re an Arsenal fan so you’re going to think this is the case.

        But I would rather have them say we stick with the on-fiels because there’s no evidence to overturn it.

        Would you like if refs just started disallowing goals because they feel like it, despite the lack of evidence?

        • PandiBong@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah well what you „would rather” doesn’t make a good decision. So we now have refs who don’t make decisions because of VAR and VAR that doesn’t want to overturn decisions because of “clear and obvious” (ie friends). The whole sequence of events at Newcastle in that one play is enough to disband VAR all and together, that’s how bad it is.

          At what point did we come to “it’s subjective not a clear and obvious error” of Gabriel being pushed to simply looking at it on a replay and seeing Gabriel being pushed? Tear it all down.