• Advanced-Bet-8811@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This rule is just for this January transfer window. We will see what happens and then have a clearer picture of what is happening and who is really benefiting from it this January

  • BrickEnvironmental37@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    UEFA need to intervene and say you can’t loan players in from countries that do not adhere to FFP.

    The PIF could essentially sign Mbappe, Haaland, Bellingham et al, pay them 2 million a week and just loan them out to one of their European clubs.

  • benc777@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reports Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Man City, Chelsea, Everton, Wolves, Forest voted against.

  • Capable_Secret5000@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How exactly is this a Newcastle issue when the majority of PL clubs voted against the rule changes? Yet another example that fans shouldnt sit on their high horses as the clubs know they are involved in shady shit

  • Argos74@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    a) Instead of football teams, there will be groups of clubs owned by the same Sovereign Investment Fund / plc / James Bond villain. The FFP limits will be ammortised for the group, and players transferred at will between group clubs, making a mockery of the FFP regulations.

    b) Probably the same clubs who were up for the European breakway league, plus a few who think they can join up at a later date.

    c) I give up. Everton thrown (and I’m not a blue) to the wolves over breaking the FFP reg while UK ambassadors emailing the PIF over the Newcastle takeover. Shenanigans with Chelsea, Manchester City, now Spurs. World Cups bought and sold like trinkets for the prestige and junkets for oligarchs, celebs and their hangers on. I give up. It’s not a sport. It’s not a business. It’s not even anything I recognise anymore. It’s just rotten to the core.

    I’ll pay a tenner to watch my local club, have a cup of boiling Bovril in the rain, and cheer on a bunch of lads working as joiners and call centre monkeys during the week. Because they’re still footballers, and that’s still football.

  • titchrich@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have thought that keeping all of the expensive talent in the Saudi league is the aim though right? Why pay all that money to raise the standard/profile of your league to send the best of them to Newcastle? Not sure how loaning a player for 6 months or even a year would help Newcastle really? Takes our new signings a while to get up to speed with Eddies training/tactics so not a great move really, it would be better to loan with an option to buy which might end up happening.
    Personally hope loans from Saudi don’t happen for any club but these are the rules that the clubs wanted… Along with no automated offsides, seems like the clubs aren’t capable of managing themselves anymore but seems to be the Newcastle fans getting the stick again instead.

    • TheSpartan83@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t even need to be the expensive talent in Saudi. Get 4 players signed up to 4 different clubs in the Saudi league, with transfer fees of say circa £50m per player. All 4 are loaned to Newcastle on 2 year loans. FFP works in 3 year cycles (I think?), leaving a huge amount of breathing space for the club’s finances and you’ve signed nearly half an outfield starting 11 in the process. If you really want to push the boundaries of sporting integrity, those players sign for the Saudi clubs on 2 year contracts and have “gentlemans agreements” to sign pre contracts with Newcastle in the months leading to the expiration of their contracts.

      It’s open to plenty of abuse if they want it to be.

  • ElectronicAlps99@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some absolute bedwetters in here mind. I guess now we know how City fans have felt for years with these moaning bastards.

  • PercySledge@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The way this has been reported is so cringe. It’s presented as if the league have literally voted on just whether Newcastle can loan Saudi players, completely obfuscating the fact that multiple clubs are part of a fleet ownership of clubs globally

  • V1k1ngVGC@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you are telling me… the Saudis can sign a player for 100m and lend him out to Newcastle for peanuts?

    Or even better. Sign a Newcastle player and loan him out to Newcastle.

  • Quiet_Moose7749@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This really is only an issue if Newcastle brings in players that make them better. No one cares if Newcastle brings in Hendo.

  • ChelseaPIFshares@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I cant wait to see Neymar and Benzema play for Newcastle lol

    Honestly though, as unfair as this is, I always did want to see some of those guys play in the premier league.

    Also how stupid is Sheikh Mansour that he never thought of doing this. (Edit, I think this is wrong, but it kind of exposes how much smarter the Saudi ownership is than Sheikh Mansour and his staff.)

  • The_Ghost_Of_Pedro@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    NUFC fan here and I think there should be a ban on transfers between clubs owned by the same people.

    It’s annoying that it’s been massively ignored for years until Ashworth did an interview saying he was aware of the opportunities, but that’s modern football.