If I was logged into several instances at once in the client and seeing the composite feed and then could choose instance when replying or posting (with some set default, like from: field in e-mail clients) lemmy.world could ban piracy all it wants and it’d still be in my feed without me having to leave it or change instances.

  • Red@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    The liftoff app has the ability to show multiple accounts across multiple instances.

    Also… Lemmy.world has/will become the default at this point in time. When you eventually get big enough you even up having to cater for the “laws”.

    Are they defederating from instances that are neutral as well? Or defed’ing from the privacy instances?

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the first instance that has done something because of legal concerns about content from other instances. Many have already defederated from lemmynsfw.com because of that.

      • Red@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you defederate from porn because of legal reasons you might as well be a private instance. Porn is allowed in every country bar a few on earth, and users even have the ability to turn off all NSFW content via their profile. Adult content is the easiest to solve for.

        But that is just porn and I understand your point. At the end of the day, any instance is allowed to connect with whomever they want. Regardless of reasoning.

        We had a few communities on Reddthat that were blocked on an instance level by hacking the database. After it subscribes between two instances you remove the db connection and it tricks Lemmy and doesn’t re-subscribe.

        Within a month, third party applications will have multi account auto creation features with syncing of community subscriptions or abilities to connect directly into the communities that are siloed.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The entire point of federated social media is that you can swap instances if you don’t agree with policies. That’s the whole point of Lemmy!

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      All lemmy needs is to allow us to export/import our sub and block lists to make it easy tbh. Then it’ll be purrfect.

  • faintedheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    There should be an option to see all posts on our feed from all our instances. Then when commenting choose the instance from which the comment has to be posted.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This needs to be done carefully. At the extreme you’re asking every instance for a list of posts from all instances. It could become something like a DOS. Having just a few accounts should be fine though. Or just asking one instance for “all” and others for “local”.

      • SamboT@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe a digital signature of some kind to copy and paste from one account to another, or account to account import/export of the subscribe list.

  • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why you don’t join the popular instance. Eventually the shitbirds ruin it.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, I joined the smallest of the bigger communities and it has worked out pretty well. I’ll probably need to leave eventually once it gets too big, but for now it works well.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When I joined, there were about three major instances, and the rest were quite a bit smaller (I.e. <50 users). So I picked the smallest of the big instances (I think it had 500 or so users).

          Basically, I wanted more than 100 or so users to have a better chance of the admin being active enough to respond to issues, but I didn’t want to be with one of the top instances to avoid outages and whatnot.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Looking at the numbers now, I’d probably go with tchncs, lemmy.ca, or programming.dev, based largely on userbase, hosting location, and a quick look at the front page. But for now, sh.itjust.works has been pretty reliable, so I haven’t felt the need to switch.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Awesome. :)

                  I’m in the US, and I’d prefer to not have one based here due to stupid local laws. sh.itjust.works is based in Canada, so that works well enough for me.

                  Looking through the top instances, I’m glad to see a lot more diversity in instance locations with lots of users. It used to mostly be US, CA, and Germany (and maybe UK?), but now there’s a lot more.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I was logged into several instances at once…without me having to leave it or change instances.

    So you’re working around having to change instances by changing instances? Am I missing something?

  • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Banning piracy? Like the mere encouragement or?

    That instance is fast becoming moderated as just as much of a neoliberal authoritarian shithole as r/politics was 🤦

    • nbafantest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Banning any chance that instance owners face legal actions for piracy.

      It’s really not tough reasoning. The vast majority of instances will do the same.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The irony bring that Reddit itself doesn’t ban piracy related stuff as long as you don’t outright post links publicly… It’s a shitty kind of platform to do that anyway.

      • transistor@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they don’t want any chance of facing legal actions then they should just shut down the instance.

        • nbafantest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s horrible advice lol

          And I completely disagree. I’m quite happy to continue using this site.

          Imo your advice is counter to the foundation of the fediverse. If you want piracy, then go to a piracy instance. Vote with your feet, my friend.

          • transistor@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not asking you to stop using lemmy.world. It’s their instance, they can do whatever they want. I was replying to the above comment that the Instance owners don’t want any chance of getting sued. As long as they have an Instance in the Fediverse, there will always be a chance of getting sued.

            • clgoh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But it is perfectly normal to try to lower the risk of getting sued, even if the chance will never be zero.

    • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Banning piracy? Like the mere encouragement or?

      Just the mere encouragement & discussion, yes. The banned communities do not allow direct links to pirated content (!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com has a rule forbidding that).

      It’s strange to see people saying there was some sort of legit reasoning, the lemmy.world admins did not receive any sort of legal DMCA/NTD request or anything of the sort. They were simply trolled hard by a brand new account from lemm.ee asking to defederate from “piracy” communities and lemmy.world admins took the bait. See the post yourself https://lemmy.world/post/3175920

      Incidentally that same user has created troll accounts at other instances & have been getting themselves banned, they were already banned at the dbzer0 instance (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/1956277) so it looks like it was simple retaliation to attempt to trick other instances into defederating/blocking them.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      neoliberal authoritarian shithole

      Meanwhile the admin not wanting to deal with the inevitable legal trouble: T_T

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it has to do with ideologies but more like the admins can’t afford a fight against the very same people you’re talking about.

      • ribboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh. That’s not really how it works though. If pirated content is not actually spread on the platform nothing illegal is happening, and regardless, long before any fight was going to happen there would have been takedown request.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but why risk it when this is essentially a volunteer project?

          I’m not saying they’re right. I’m just saying I understand their concerns. Others don’t care and allow piracy content just fine.

  • 30021190@lemmy.cloud.aboutcher.co.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jerboa is fairly simple in terms of its the instance that does the majority of heavy lifting.

    What you’re asking for could be solved in Jerboa with some work, or you could host your own instance and get what you need now without community effort.

  • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Niche communities should be on niche instances and users should join smaller instances that federate with their interests.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This kind of defeats the purpose of federation, no? The point is, I thought, that it didn’t really matter which instance you joined.

      • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t, but it doesn’t mean organisation and thus increased discoverability are a bad thing

      • Red@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t matter what instance you join if every instance also employs no blocks.

        At this point in time it is starting to matter. With the increased instance level blocks and defederation.
        In the future it won’t matter as you will have mobile/web apps that create multiple accounts on the instances you want that have the communities you want to subscribe too.

        If the communities are only created on the big instances, and the big instance decides to defederate from your home instance then you no longer have any way from your home instance to get access. Thus the future features I have alluded to become a real need.

        Op made a valid point, if small niche groups form around small instances, you will have less issues and the instance will be for everyone who wants to join that community. Then it would truly be a decentralized platform where each instance is one or two communities. An instance block would not have the blast radius. For example, I don’t think anyone who is small has the ability to block Lemmy.world . They are too big and have too many communities. If you were to block them you would need to setup the communities on your own instance. Whether that works or not and whether enough people join around it who knows.

        Like you said tho, a community on a small instance had less chance for good visibility and being found. But that is where third parties come into play like browse.feddit.de. without them the early migrations would have struggled and community discovery would also have been an issue too.

        Now that I’m thinking about it, if we could integrate the feddit browser into all the lemmy instances so when you search on your local instance it would show all items not just ones your instance knows about… That would help solve part of the discovery issues… Brb I need to chat with the feddit admins :p

  • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    ITT: Entitled twats getting grumpy that a private service won’t host their discussion about stealing content they’re definitely entitled to.