• daddywookie@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cricket has the advantage of being largely objective. The ball touched the bat or it didn’t. The ball pitched in line or it didn’t. The batsman made his ground or he didn’t. When the tech fails, like spotting if fingers are under a grounded ball, then you still get controversy.

    Football has so much subjectivity in the rules that developing a simple system for it is hard. What is a fair tackle, what is excessive force, what is interfering with play, what was a goal scoring opportunity?

    • SidJag@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not about objective vs subjective rules.

      The specific post is about communication howlers in VAR.

      It’s about process which tennis, rugby, cricket have all shown for years to be very transparent and meticulous.

      Football’s refusal to benchmark and adapt these SOPs is the problem.

      Not the fact that a ‘reckless tackle worthy of red vs yellow’ is a subjective call (which it is) - follow a transparent process, mic up, and own your decisions.

      PGMOL makes calls and then gives hare brained explanations to protect its ilk.