• fa_football@alien.topOPB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Offensively speaking you’re right but not defensively. They’ve leaked goals quite badly and when I’ve watched a few Fulham matches, I’ve felt like their midfield becomes too open at times. Like the article rightly points out more specifically - opponents find space between the midfield and defensive lines.

    • MrVegosh@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every team hangs together as a whole. Having a worse or better striker does not only impact your attack. That’s three-year-old analysis. If you striker is shit your midfield might not have anyone to play the ball too, making them lose the ball often and in dangerous zones. This is just one way having a bad striker makes your forwards, midfield, and defense look shit.

      Think about the recent Liverpool seasons without decent CBs and without good midfielders. Everything looked worse. (Except Alisson cause he is the goat)

      • kubedkubrick@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also the midfield may be over exposing them trying to compensate by attacking more for the lack of ruthless striker.

      • FastenedCarrot@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That and it has an impact on how teams play against you. If they don’t fear your attack they’re less likely to sit off and give extra space in midfield.