I dont get this, why is nearly every single leading scorer from the new era?

Why is it never like „yeah he played in the 70s and is leading scorer off xyz“

You can check that, i am not talking bs, its hard to find a leading scorer that was in his prime between 1970-90

Why?

      • SamCham10@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ties and no results will still garner a one point gain, but they’re far rarer than a win/loss so no point in changing it

        • FallingSwords@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not anymore. World Cup games and qualifiers are all settled by super over, which is a bit rubbish imo. We (Scotland) qualify for the WC if Holland vs WI is a tie and not a Super Over win for Holland so I am a little biased mind.

          • jamughal1987@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They made lot of changes. They removed runners too I found in this World Cup but we have sub now instead.

          • jamughal1987@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was stuck in 8 East for overtime. I was just taking care of fire safety.

            Kiwis too nice it was their cup.

    • skie1994@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What cricket World cup? There was certainly no world cup this year and certainly India wouldn’t lose in the finals.