My recent experience with the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s camera during a concert was far from stellar. It was terrible, to say the least. The phone’s sluggish response time made capturing moments a frustrating task, and the super slow shutter speed resulted in consistently blurry images. Comparatively, a friend using a much older iPhone 14 Pro Max effortlessly captured sharper shots because of its faster shutter speed. While the phone obviously excels in daylight photography, it struggles in low-light conditions and with moving objects. The lingering question is: Why hasn’t Samsung addressed these performance issues promptly?

I wish I could post the comparison pictures between hers and mine pictures. All the pictures I took of the artist looked like she was made of wax. It’s mind-blowing how a 200mp camera was unable to take better pictures than a 12mp camera. And we were both front row, so the artist was less than 5 feet away from us.

For video, it worked great. For pictures, not so much…

  • ex-ALT@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    MP aren’t everything. And as said the 200mp camera isn’t for low light settings.

      • ex-ALT@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Il be honest I don’t really rate Samsung cameras, always look to be good on paper but not necessarily in practice.

        • paiva_gabriel@alien.topOPB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like the camera is amazing in ideal situations, but not in other situations. iPhone Cameras are more reliable, despite not always shooting the best pictures

          • ex-ALT@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah they can be decent. Pixel takes the cake generally for me along with iPhone.