The Biden administration is continuing its push to bring internet connectivity to every home and business in the U.S.

      • geosoco@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed on the 100% part, but this absolutely isn’t specific to political parties. They both love giving corporate handouts with no strings attached. I suspect this has more to do with campaign donations than anything else. It’s the same with defense spending where we regularly just can’t account for millions of dollars.

        Even with the PPP, which was fully bipartisan, they claimed to have strings and then just forgave 10 million of them, even though we know many workers never saw the money intended for them. Slightly different situation, but similar things happened with rural internet initatives in the 90s as well

        • NightAuthor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My super generalized statement wasn’t so much saying that dems were the only corporatists, but that just that they espouse social good and use that as the means and justification for their inevitably corporatist actions.

          One of my favorite ones was Obama care, making insurance companies record profits. Where did that money come from? Us… taxpayers. The ones it was supposed to save money. I’m sure there were some outliers that were really helped with the whole pre-existing conditions protections, but the rest of us got shafted.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, more handouts for the ISPs? $400B wasn’t enough? NO government money should be given to ISP companies until the people who stole the last money are held accountable.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      here it’s going to a company that’s charging double or triple (or more) what the phone companies do in the country where dsl has been extended… and for far less speed…

      these guys certainly aren’t using those public funds to build an adequate network in the rural / small towns part of the state.

    • ptsdstillinmymind @lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, they do it every time because it’s not like they are going to get charged with fraud and money laundering. They should all be RICOed

  • WagesOf@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do what the constitution says you have the power to do. Have the usps create a modern communication system that gives connectivity to every home in the USA.

    We could have done fiber to the home three times over for what the ISPs have stolen since the 80s.

  • unomar@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder if a credit voucher kind of system could work. Rather than give the money directly to the ISPs who will take the money and change nothing. What if each user in the area was given a credit voucher for their share. They don’t get to keep the money, but can choose to spend their voucher via an ISP who meets the criteria. Customers see direct benefit because they’re “purchasing” services with govt money and ISPs can’t just take the money without reinvesting.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      we can also just pay for the CapEx for a municipal broadband project, or countywide public broadband or something

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man, this would be the dream. The US has let a lot of essential services and utilities become run by private companies seeking only the highest profit. There’s some things that should be provided by the government, and I believe internet connection is one of them.