cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/12225991

TL;DR: The common view on Meta’s Threads is that it will be either all good or all bad, leading to oversimplified and at the end contra productive propositions like the Fedipact. But in reality, it’s behaviour will most likely change dynamically over time, and therefore, to prevent us getting in a position, in which Threads can actually perform EEE on us, we need to adapt a dynamic strategy as well.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I disagree that those are the options. The fediverse is made up largely of people that are actively seeking alternatives to the very models of big commercial social networks. We have built and are growing this alternative in spite of the ‘competition’ from the commercial players. We don’t need (or want) them. Facebook adopting the activity pub protocol does not mean we have to federate with them, and we should be beyond suspicious that they want to federate with us. No good can come of it.

    The important thing for me is that the fediverse remains an alternative network, rather than simply an alternative ‘client’ for Facebook.

    • buntspecht@lemmy.ca@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ok, but if you do this, when comes the time when you try to grow the Fediverse again? Currently, the Fediverse has about 2M users, which are mostly on Mastodon. With the entry of Threads, this percentage will decrease over time. It will weaken or position further. Probably, there will be some companies that will try to compete with threads and if we are lucky, they are nice to us. But on paper, our percentage and our influence will decrease further. When is the point when you turn the switch to growth and claim room in the market?

      So no, I don’t see how it could work. I think we are currently in the best position that we will have in the next years and we should use it to our advantage.

      Facebook adopting the activity pub protocol does not mean we have to federate with them, and we should be beyond suspicious that they want to federate with us. No good can come of it.

      Its pretty clear what they want: they see an emerging market and they want to claim and dominate it like they always do and they want to use us for their growth and they will use that growth for potentially bad things. That’s all to be expected. But as long as they federate nicely with us, we should federate with them too. People will start asking themselves why some users have different domains and when important public figures start posting from the fediverse, word will get around. People thrive for freedom. I would go as far as saying that we have a responsibility here: our presence on Threads shows people the alternative to walled gardens.

      And once important public figures have migrated in the Fediverse, temporary defederation will hurt Meta much more. Meta hugely underestimating what happens if the Left has pointed out the Fediverse as their new frontier.

      How can all of that happen by just defederating? For me its a form of casting away responsibility.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The fediverse is not “an emerging market”. It is in fact, competing for market share with the likes of Facebook. They don’t give a shit about the technology, they just need the users. They feel threatened that people are jumping ship, and the best thing they can think to do is make sure they own the alternatives. Facebook will use its size and power to essentially turn mastodon into a Facebook client. In some ways I admire your optimistic outlook, but I cannot share it.

        • buntspecht@lemmy.ca@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          A facebook client that can chose to defederate from facebook? The overall vibe on Threads is already not exactly great. Threads growth is limited (altough it could franchise at some point).

          It would be good if the market outside Threads would continue to grow at such a rate that it is too expensive for Threads to pull EEE. As it is currently. As long as this is the case, the fediverse has a chance of surving.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah but then it’s too late. You think you are going to eat facebook’s lunch, but it’s gonna be the other way around.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Normally companies like Facebook just buy their competition, and either kill it or control it. They can’t buy activity pub so this is their strategy instead. Their goal is still the same: kill or control. Why on earth would you want to partner with someone who has that attitude towards you?

                • buntspecht@lemmy.ca@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Its a monopoly, its behaving like a monopoly. But because of network effects, we cannot just ignore it, we have to go in direct combat.

                  At least if you want the Fediverse (with a diverse instance-landscape) to become big, confrontation with Meta is inevitable.

                  If you don’t want it to become big, that’s fine, but then we have a different opinion there.

                  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Network effects are already in play even before Facebook adopts federation. I, like many others here have sacrificed the convenience of a Facebook network for a better alternative. The fediverse is growing in spite of it’s disadvantage in terms of network effect. Let Facebook die of enshittification and it’s users will find the alternatives. Rather than “direct combat” with the giant, I prefer to say “the only winning move, is not to play”.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Say threads has like 100 million users. Your instance federates with 1 million users. Then you federate with threads so now you federate with 101 million. You get some new users by saying “hey check it out, interact with Facebook without having an account there”. Later you decide to defederate from threads and go back to your 1 or 1.1 million users. Who is going to stay on your instance? Anyone attracted by federation with Facebook is going to leave, along with any existing users that got used to/enjoyed federating with Facebook.

                • buntspecht@lemmy.ca@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Fair point - but: along with threads, hopefully there will be many other instances with, say, 20 million users combined. So the instance will still have 20 million users federating. And if the reason for the defederation was justified, maybe other instances will jump along too and then Threads loses 21 million users as well.

                  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I guess we’ll just have to wait and see. I will personally not be on any fediverse instance that federates with threads.