We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Because copyright law is clear in that computers can’t own a copyright.

    The humans at play are:

    1. The artist who created the original work.

    2. The computer IT team who are copying the data behind the scenes between servers.

    3. You who uses Midjourney to recreate “Joker” movie artwork, likely using the data in #2 which falls under copyright infringement.

    It doesn’t matter how #2 works. It doesn’t matter if its H.265 or MPEG2 or from VHS tapes, or if its a Neural Network using the latest-and-greatest training weights from a GPU-based datasystem. Its just a computer. The ones doing the copyright infringement are the people copying data from place to place.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The AI model is not a copy of the set of data used to train it, it’s a derivative work. As such copyright as it currently stands does not apply. It’s possible, likely even, that copyright will be modified in some way soon to account for this, but the situation today says nope, not copyright infringement.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re really trying so hard cuz they absolutely want this to be infringement but it simply isnt on any legal level.