• OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nobody should believe anything because of a “bro trust me” and if you do you have a serious problem. I know nobody cares if I believe it, I am not stupid

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Denual is a refuge for weak arguments. Obviously the the countries that control fund8ng are not in denial.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Bruh, “above our paygrade” is a prime example of denial, deflection, and appeal to authority.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            Another way of saying I do not have the information that the various countries have is not denial.

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Scepticism in the face of a lack of evidence, especially for a claim from one side involved in a war, is not only a good idea but necessary. Would you just believe a Russian claim about Ukranian schools, no questions asked?

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yeah, or about Russia invading Ukraine! Wait.

            If you look at documents at the time, intelligence agencies said there was a possibility he had WMDs, but there was no conclusive evidence nor assurances.

            The Bush Administration lied to Congress and said we knew for sure they had them.

            Edit: It’s good to have healthy skepticism – it hasn’t escaped my notice that the majority of evidence behind this claim is coming from Israel. I don’t think it’s wise to deem it automatically false however, and pulling funding is premature. There should however be a serious internal investigation. And if they already have smoking guns, the UN should release them in the interest of transparency.

            Apologies for starting out my comment as a bit of a jackass.