Many lists put Die Another Day last

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    They weren’t cheesy Cinematic Bond. They were realist Book Bond.

    That said, they said the same thing about Daniel Craig in Casino Royale.

    Connery had a bit of Dad-Joke cheese, especially in the later movies. Lazenby had slightly less cheese, but he only got the acting role because he was such a good con-artist/actor. Moore had all the Cheese and all the Camp. A few wheels short of Niven/Austin Powers. Dalton bought it back to the hard gritty roots, with a few jokes to dull the violence. Brosnan was a good balance between Moore and Dalton, primarily action/espionage with a bit of Cheese to appeal to the Moore fans. Craig removed all the cheese and went back to gritty. Almost like Dalton but with honest reality-based action.

    If you like Craig but don’t like Dalton, ask yourself what is more realistic, an Aston Martin rolling without the help of a hydraulic ram or a Mack Truck pulling a “mono” on eight wheels?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Craig was after The Bourne Identity and it’s many sequels. I think that’s the key difference. Maybe Craig sells the brutality a little better than Dalton. Got more physicality to him. And if you don’t count Quantum of Solace, he also had much better movies.

      Dalton just felt like the Andrew Garfield of Bonds. Let down by the movies not really knowing what they wanted to be, rather than his performance. He’s superb in Hot Fuzz, to the point I now think of him as a local supermarché owner than as James Bond.

    • HerrVorragend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Perfect description why I do not care for Bond movies involving Dalton or Craig.

      To me, they do not incorporate the cheesieness and suave/arrogant amused attitude that made James Bond interesting.