Non-paywall link

South Carolina high school English teacher Mary Wood was reprimanded last school year for teaching a lesson on race. She began teaching it again this year.

Mary Wood walked between the desks in her AP English Language and Composition classroom, handing out copies of the book she was already punished once for teaching.

Twenty-six students, all but two of them White, looked down at Ta-Nehisi Coates’s “Between the World and Me,” a memoir that dissects what it means to be Black in America — and which drew calls for Wood’s firing when she tried to teach it last year in her mostly White, conservative town. Wood crossed to a lectern and placed her hands on either side of a turquoise notebook, open to two pages of bullet points explaining why she wanted to teach Coates’s work.

“That book that you guys have, it deals with racism,” she said on a recent Tuesday. “It’s going to be something with which you’re unfamiliar. That you need to spend time to research to fully understand.”

Wood stared at her class. She tried to make eye contact with every teenager. Anyone, she reminded herself, might be secretly recording her — or planning to report her.

Plus, both teachers believed the book, a Pulitzer Prize finalist, is superbly written: a master class in the deployment of rhetorical devices. There was no better way to teach children how to formulate their own arguments, they thought.

“It teaches kids a different perspective, [it] teaches kids how to write well,” Wood said in an interview. And “it’s the right thing to do.”

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    9 months ago

    The book was written in 2015. It did not even had time to be recognized as literally important, only as socially important.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      So you’re saying an English class shouldn’t study modern usages of the language and only read older pieces that are considered “important” by an unspecified metric? Sounds totally reasonable

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      It won the National Book Award and Toni Morrison praised it. The Guardian ranked it 7th on their list of the 100 best books of the 21st century. So uh…

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, for “depiction of America’s race problem”. And it is a good book for that. There are good books for popular science, that also takes awards for good depiction of, say, physics. But you do not study those in Literature classes, do you?

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          9 months ago

          Science books don’t tend to employ rhetorical devices, something that IS taught in English classes and what this book is being used for.

          If a science book were ever to be an excellent example of rhetoric? Yes, it should be used in an English class.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hey, I changed my mind. It turns out the teachers also thought that the book is superbly written and being excellent material for rhetoric. This information was missing in the original post, that created impression that she gave the book only because it is about racism.

            • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              It was literally in the article that the teacher was using it for teaching rhetoric.

              Maybe try reading the article first before popping off next time?

    • MisterFeeny@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      “literally”

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      However, the book DOES have “literary importance,” as determined by it winning the National Book Award, winning the Kirkus Prize, and being a Pulitzer finalist.

      Though I notice elsewhere in the thread you refer to those as “literature prices” multiple times, and would like to point out that they are, in fact, “prizes”. Prices are the cost of things you buy at the store. Prizes are awarded for achievement in a given field.

      As such, I do not believe you are fit to be the arbiter of what gets to be taught in English class. It is clear you could use a few lessons on the subject yourself, and besides, before espousing that a book should only be taught in one type of classroom (Social Studies) and not another (English), a person should probably read said book. You clearly haven’t.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hey, I changed my mind. It turns out the teachers also thought that the book is superbly written and being excellent material for rhetoric. This information was missing in the original post, that created impression that she gave the book only because it is about racism.