• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nope. The set of repairable designs is a subset of the set of constructable designs. Bigger search space means you can optimize the weight further. I wish I could say this in a less abstract sounding way but no, you don’t get to claim that adding a new requirement to a design can definitely be done without sacrificing on weight.

    Sure, there’s designs to be had that are in that space, but they’re harder to get to than the design they found.

    • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      you don’t get to claim that adding a new requirement to a design can definitely be done without sacrificing on weight

      This is the ‘My argument is right because I say so’ argument. You don’t get to unilaterally make unsubstantiated claims like that and then preempt the opposition like that.

      Your arguments lack technical merit or the support by real world cases. Have you ever stopped to think that such arguments are only made by Apple and their fanbois? Repeating a lie doesn’t make it true.