The dispute comes from Colorado — but it could have national implications for Trump and his political fate.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Sure, they would still adhere to originalism. But they would knowingly create a precedent where it doesn’t apply. Future Justices are supposed to respect precedent, so this means handing future liberal courts a useful new tool to dismantle their contribution to legal theory.

    Is saving Trump from himself worth ending their own legacy?

    • Nobody@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d really like to think that these justices still care about things like legacy and consistency, but I’m not sure that’s the case. I suppose we’ll find out soon enough.

      That, or they’ll punt the ruling on some bullshit like waiting for Congress to act. That seems most likely at this point.