• nac82@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You mean, you have an idea in your head that you think should be enforced on everybody despite it not being democratically placed.

    The word for that is fascist. And it just so happens to be the right to deadly violence lmao.

    Irony is dead.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      That makes little sense. Can you expand? Democratically placed sounds like you don’t get out government.

      We are a constitutional republic. Not everything is voted on. It’s what protects our rights. Otherwise things like gay marriage could be illegal by a vote or trans people could be voted out. With the constitution they are protected from the tyranny of the majority.

      • nac82@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        And none of that applies to thoughts living in your head. You want to enforce your beliefs on everybody without any government process.

        Those beliefs is in regards to your right to deadly violence.

        You are a violent fascist who uses linguistics on democracy and constitutional republic to dismiss the violence you are advocating.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          What are you rambling about? You are making no sense.

          Can you be more clear what thoughts you are referencing ?

          I outlined the government process.

          And what violence am I advocating ? I have advocated for no violence.

          • nac82@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I recommend you read the thread if you are confused about the discussion.

            We weren’t discussing a political process. We were discussing your headcannon of the 2nd amendment and how it aligns perfectly with the stance of a violent fascist.

              • nac82@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I think the 2nd amendment was poorly written. I’ve read on it extensively and I don’t think it conveys the idea behind it. I think since the courts have further muddled the topic.

                THE LAW

                Lmao did you bring the rest of the circus with you?

                Repeating “you’re making no sense” is a poor form of coping since you can’t address things people actually said.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Do you think the 2nd amendment conveys the right for a citizen to own a firearm without any ties to a militia ?

                  • nac82@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I think you are desperate to change the topic rather than respond to the conversation honestly.