• zelifcam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Someone said on hacker news …

    That someone simply read the lawsuit that’s been posted a billion times. Did you read the article you posted? The first sentence links to their summary of the lawsuit.

    Edit: Whether it’s a genuine pursuit or not on Elon’s part, it’s not the worst thing in the world to fight for AI to be completely open. Or in his case, the company he helped fund.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      it’s not the worst thing in the world to fight for AI to be completely open

      No, but is that really what Musk is trying to do here?

      • zelifcam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Which is why I said:

        Whether it’s a genuine pursuit or not on Elon’s part

        I suppose I didn’t separate those thoughts properly. But that’s exactly what I was getting at. If you read his lawsuit, that’s certainly at least part of the picture he’s trying to paint.

        Edit: I’m not sure if you’re just bored and looking to argue? But you simply restated my point.

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          My point was more that I’m not sure what he’s doing counts as “fighting to keep AI open”. I mean, yes, that may be the stated purpose, but I really don’t believe that’s what he’s getting at

          • zelifcam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Musk alleges that OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft has transformed the organization “into a closed-source de facto subsidiary” of Microsoft that’s focused on maximizing profits.

            Yeah. There’s some verbiage there to suggest that. And I believe the part where I said whether he’s genuine about it , covers my thought about the uncertainty of his intentions.

            We are splitting hairs here, but you responded to me with a personal question that I believe I had already covered. ?