• DaseinPickle@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s a strange argument. I want my group chats with friends and family to be private. Why should Telegram or Meta be allowed to spy on my private conversations just because there are more than two people?

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Look, I too love privacy and serverless software but give me a break. Complaining about your family group chats “not being private” (it’s not exactly true) is like complaining why you can’t host your cat photos on a TOR website (you can do that in fact).

      In Telegram, chats (groups really) are called private if they are invite-only, and otherwise they are public.

      When you create a group chat, even with just 2 people it’s not e2e encrypted. Secret chats are, and they only work with 2 ends. You could create a group chat and selectively use secret chat with each member to share private stuff, but that would be quite a chore.

      Chats are hosted on servers for the same reason why you host your (cat photos filled) homepage outside of your house. Just because stuff is hosted elsewhere doesn’t mean it’s being spied on.

      From what I understand, there was no evidence that Telegram spies on your private chats. There are cases where Telegram is asked to take measures against certain person based on their activity in public chats …by government of authoritarian regimes …after Telegram tries and fails to oppose that request …and it probably doesn’t involve Telegram looking into messages made by the person in question in groups not mentioned in the original request (which would mean that person’s family chats remain private).

      So, if you live under an authoritarian regime and like discussing protest activities in your family group chat before some of your family members decides to report on you or share one of your messages in another public chat - the one who puts you in danger is yourself. And I doubt that chat not being hosted somewhere would save you from danger in that case.

      Otherwise, your private groups are private and it’s safe to chat with your family through Telegram.

      • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why would I use non encrypted group chat when I can just use Signal. Why use a product with bad security?

        It doesn’t matter if there is evidence of Telegram spying or not. They have the capability to do it. And with all the companies selling customers data to train AI, I don’t want to risk it. And the best part is, that I don’t have to, because there is Signal and all my friends already use it.

        I don’t mind things being hosted elsewhere as long as it’s encrypted and the host provider do not have the keys. That is not the case with Telegram. If you like Telegram, sure use it. But don’t use Telegram if you value privacy, use it because you like its user experience and know that you are sacrificing privacy. That might be fine for you, but not for me.

        • rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t mind things being hosted elsewhere as long as it’s encrypted and the host provider do not have the keys. That is not the case with Telegram.

          So you would prefer a platform to not have the keys to hosted content but allow that to every group member? That’s not much different from sharing your credit card details with your friends.

          People hate telegram for wrong reasons.

          Problem is that “bad security” is a misleading description of how telegram handles data. I see, people like to say these words when they fear that “my text is going to be fed to AI” or “my files are going to be hosted on a hardware not under my control” and I disagree that these are security issues. The moment you allow someone else to host your content (even text) you should raise an alarm if you are so careful about those things. But you allow that with signal.

          If someone wanted to report on you with signal, they still could. It may fail, not because its chats are e2e encrypted, but because they don’t keep stuff on servers.

          Hosting allows telegram have public communication features. You can basically use it to read news and comment on them. You can save your content, share it with your group and not worry that it will expire at some point or that new members of your group will not be able to see it. You can organize with other people for any activity, public or not.

          So, Telegram provides features that are incompatible with privacy aspects some people want. Signal provides features that prevent it from becoming a platform for mass communication and communities. Both are fine. It’s a mistake to compare them by the same standards.

          • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            So you would prefer a platform to not have the keys to hosted content but allow that to every group member? That’s not much different from sharing your credit card details with your friends.

            That is not how encryption works. Not even remotely. You only share your public key with people you communicate with not your private key. This is not comparable with sharing credit card information. You need to read up on how encryption work.

            And there is no reason Telegram could not host information and still encrypt it. Lots of services do that.

            Look at ProtonMail/ProtonDrive they host mails and files without having any access to it. Look at Keybase, they host all kind of encrypted communications services without having access. Telegram could do it, they choose not to, and that should be a concern.

            • rdri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              This is not comparable with sharing credit card information.

              How so? Your family would have the same access to your private chats and nothing would stop them from using it with malicious intent.

              How encryption works is not the issue. The issue is with people expecting it to protect content shared with a group.

              Maybe read about how telegram handles data. It’s encrypted.

              • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                What’s your point? The same goes for 1-1 chats. If you don’t trust the people you are communicating with encryption is not going to help you. It just happens that I do trust my friends and family. And it’s not about sharing specific sensitive information, it’s about using technology that prevents mass surveillance. And Telegram is just a bad tool for that. You might as well use Instagram.

                • rdri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  The same goes for 1-1 chats

                  Exactly.

                  it’s about using technology that prevents mass surveillance. And Telegram is just a bad tool for that.

                  You did not read, sigh.

                  What’s your point?

                  Already stated above. People put themselves in danger by using public groups to discuss dangerous stuff. You prefer using an app that doesn’t give you such a possibility and call it “secure”. It doesn’t make sense if you never wanted to discuss dangerous stuff or use public groups in the first place.

                  • DaseinPickle@leminal.space
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I dont know why you keep arguing that encryption should only be used to discuss dangerous stuff. It should be used to discuss private stuff. Like when I sit with my friends and talk, I want it to be private, not recorded in clear text and saved on some server. Not because it’s illegal or sensitive, but because it’s fucking private. And I can’t do that with Telegram, because it’s doesn’t encrypt my information.