The city has just 39 licensed cab drivers.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “we don’t want to pay min wage” -billionaire run companies who cannot pay people competitively with taxi services 10 years ago.

  • jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Minneapolis should make public transit free for a few* months, to encourage folks to use that instead. Golden opportunity.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The shitty gig companies decimated the taxi industry, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see things like drunk driving tick up, especially come winter.

    I hope the city can incentivize something new to fill the void. And hopefully they can also put guardrails around it so drivers and passengers don’t get screwed.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The industry got decimated due to being worse than the apps. The apps 100% exploit drivers, but let’s not act like calling a cab was such a good experience 20 years ago.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        100%

        American cabs fucked passengers. Gig companies fucked drivers.

        I recently said “fuck it, I’ll take a cab from the airport cab pool.” It was like immediately time traveling to a differently shitty moment in history. The cab smelled like it was made out of Newport filters and ass, and when we got to my home, the guy refused to take a credit or debit card.

        Dude was picking up people from the international terminal, where they were often landing without local currency, then he would tack on a trip to the bank, with the meter running.

        He had Master and Visa card stickers on his car.

        • DoctorRoxxo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s when you refuse to pay, not your fault their card reader is “broke” and they didn’t inform you when you got in. They can get fucked, they tried pulling this shit on me before. I straight refused to pay cash.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, that’s what I did. I said, you can take me to the bank for free, or I can not pay you.

            After arguing with me he then relented and one of these magically appeared.

            • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Man I have not seen one of those credit card carbon copy machines in a long time! It’s funny current credit cards will not work on them since they don’t have any raised numbers

              • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Haha yeah. My CC doesn’t even have numbers on the card. They’re in an app so they can be quickly swapped out if the card is compromised.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The apps weren’t profitable. They sold rides for less than it cost them, which killed the industry. That’s what all disruptive companies do, sell for an unprofitable price and have investor money make up the difference.

        Taxi companies could not compete. How could they? It didn’t matter if they were good or bad. There was no chance to compete because they all went out of business.

        Again, the apps didn’t win because they were better, it’s because they didn’t allow competition. In a sane world they would have had to have made a profit, and the taxi companies would have made their own app, and things would be pretty much equal across the board. But that never happened.

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Again, the apps didn’t win because they were better, it’s because they didn’t allow competition.

          I rarely ever took cabs or other such transport because they’re universally dodgy as fuck. Apps made it convenient and accountable, thus succeeded.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You miss the point, taxi companies couldn’t compete with apps, they couldn’t have their own app. Because of investor lead disruption

              • echo64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Again, they did and failed because they couldn’t compete because investors paid for the likes of uber to run everyone out of business. I don’t know how more I can explain this to you, but you don’t seem to understand.

                • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  they couldn’t have their own app

                  There was nothing stopping them and they set their own up; I’m referring to places in the UK where I know it happened, and some other countries too (SEA).

                  I don’t know how more I can explain this to you, but you don’t seem to understand.

                  Likely because of your explanation in the first place.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which is weird because what’s their overhead? They run an app. 99% should be going to drivers.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Card fees, keeping it updated, onboarding drivers and doing checks, accounting for fraud, employees, advertising. 99% is a silly figure to request.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    We support a minimum earning standard for drivers

    Is that why they spent millions to defeat a law in CA that would have clarified that their employees are in fact employees and should be covered by minimum wage laws?

    I have to wonder how hard it would be to build some kind of open source platform to compete with these companies. Then the drivers will be free to set their own rates and this rent-seeking behavior can be undermined.