Source olgaf (very NSFW sex/commedy comics)

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree with every bullet point because this comic isn’t about tax. If you would stop being such a knucklehead and respond to MY bullet points maybe you’d see we actually do have common ground. This isn’t a tax issue. I don’t know how to be more clear than that.

    • Primarily0617@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      given that one of the bulletpoints is this:

      We’ve established that tax cuts incentivize a behavior.

      you are either very bad at the thing you claim to be an expert in, or you don’t fully understand the meaning of the word “disagree”

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just don’t understand what your point is besides being a contrarian asshole for its own sake. This comic has nothing to do with tax. It is mistitled. You are complaining about the wrong thing. You keep talking and say nothing. You’re just pissed off at “corporations” in general. I am too. I’m sick of being squeezed for every penny I’ve got. But this comic isn’t a problem or solution involving tax. You’re just completely wrong and misguided. I really wish you could see that but you are intent on arguing for its own sake. It’s so incredibly frustrating. I’ve offered my suggestions for starting to come up with solutions and you won’t even read or respond. You’re just so stubborn it’s impossible to get through. I’m really trying here and you just refuse to budge. It’s actually really impressive.

        • Primarily0617@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just don’t understand what your point is

          that propagandizing children is bad? and that “i see no issues with an incentive structure to propagandize children” is orthogonal to that

          besides being a contrarian asshole for its own sake

          says the person seemingly taking the position “propagandizing children is good, actually”

          I’ve offered my suggestions for starting to come up with solutions

          solutions to what? this entire conversation is about working out whether or not propagandizing children is a bad thing or not. if it’s not a problem, which somehow seems to be your stance on this, then there’s nothing to come up with a solution to

          I’m really trying here

          you haven’t answered a single question i’ve asked you, nor have you disagreed with a single thing i’ve said, other than just now when you disagreed that tax cuts incentivize behavior

          i don’t think you’ve even stated a position other than “you’re wrong” with no further elaboration

          your contributions to this conversation almost entirely consist of trying to change the subject to talk about something else

          i’m not sure “I’m really trying here” is a particularly apt description