Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Maybe I’m naive but I kinda don’t get it. People talk about defederating as if…what, all Meta IP addresses will be magically blocked from scraping your content? Any script kiddie can harvest Lemmy/Mastodon/whatever content.

    Has Meta shown itself to be a bad actor? Yes. Should my email provider block all emails from Meta? Well…that’s a bit much I think? If Facebook email still existed, should my email provider block that?

    My point is yes, Meta bad, but all Thread users also bad? I thought — and apparently I’m very wrong here — that the Federation paradigm was kinda like email. And the only email I want blocked is a domain where every single user is malicious, not a domain run by a malicious entity which has normal people as users, who aren’t necessarily very tech literate.

    I don’t actually care, but I just find it a little confusing tbh.

    • Galli [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Threads exists for the sole purpose of capturing some of the people showing interest in the fediverse as twitter dies and keeping them in the facebook ecosystem. Once it believes it has exhausted this window of opportunity it will defederate just as it de-federated it’s xmmp based messenger service once it thought it had the upperhand.

      Every server that defederates from meta preemptively is working to build a resilient community that will survive this inevitable scenario. Every server that federates with meta will become dependent on it then collapse as their users leave to join threads once that becomes their only option to continue interacting with the threads users that their social experience was built on.

      Your post only concerns threats to an individual user re scraping or malicious interactions. The threat meta poses to the fediverse is systemic. In the long run the meta-blocking servers are the fediverse. The meta-federating servers might see some short term attention but in the long run will have the same fate as those that hitched their wagons to the metaverse.

    • young_broccoli@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I dont care if they scrape my comments I just wouldnt want to see sneaky “promoted” posts aka ads and I enjoy the idea of boycotting facebook.

      Ultimately the decision is for the instances owners and admins to make, not ours. I will just migrate to one that doesnt federate with facebook if I have to.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I just wouldnt want to see sneaky “promoted” posts aka ads

        I don’t quite see how that would even work. Those posts would need to be coming from individual users rather than from Facebook itself and you can just block those users. Facebook can display ads in between posts on their own app but those wont be visible to people using other apps.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Here’s one scenario.

          1. Facebook feeds its users content according to an algorithm.

          2. Facebook and lemmy users can interact with the same user content (liking, commenting).

          3. There are vastly more Facebook users than lemmy users.

          4. By dint of Facebook’s greater number of users, lemmy users will see the most popular content that is fed algorithmically to Facebook users.

          Conclusion: lemmy users are being fed content by the Facebook algorithm (in this still, thankfully hypothetical, scenario).

          Like imagine Facebook promotes some viral post and it gets a thousands of upvotes. Any lemmy user on a federated instance, sorting by upvotes/hot/etc, is going to see that post.

          That’s the kind of top-down reach that is so alien to the fedi

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hopefully fediverse admins are sensible enough to ban users who are blatantly posting advertisements. I know that a lot are, but I also know that a few of the bigger servers tend to turn a blind eye to that kind of thing.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I just wouldnt want to see sneaky “promoted” posts aka ads

        Nobody is forcing you to follow users/communities on Threads.

        • young_broccoli@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I like to browse by “all”. And nobody is forcing me to use an instance that federates with facebook either, like I said, I’ll migrate if I have to.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      And the only email I want blocked is a domain where every single user is malicious, not a domain run by a malicious entity which has normal people as users, who aren’t necessarily very tech literate.

      You’ll never get the tech iliterate people to switch to the rest of the Fediverse otherwise. Defederating Threads is about making it as bad as possible for its users - it’s about hurting Meta and stemming its bad influence on the web.

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not about looking what’s happening in the garden, it’s about entering in the garden. It’s two very different situations.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree, and I predict people will eventually pick instances that are doing what you suggested.

      My understanding is that the defederation is to prevent MetaFacebook from getting to a point where they control the entire thing and then destroy it.

      I don’t think defederating is the right move for that, but it’s a move

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think most people simply just don’t know how federation works and they imagine that defederating blocks Facebook from accessing your content when in reality it’s the exact opposite; it places one way mirror between us from which only they can see thru. There’s also some great irony in the fact that they’re talking about genocide while advocating for using the nuclear option to block Facebook despite the massive number of innocent casualties it’ll cause.

      EDIT: Turns out I was mistaken. Defederation indeed does stop the flow of data both ways.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Brother these things are in no way the same. One is a tech giant knowingly aiding and abbeting governments who are ethnically cleansing their country and another is not being able to see posts from a different instance. The only great irony is you calling them innocent casualties.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a comparison. By definition they’re not the same thing but there are similarities; you’re doing something that affects 100% of the userbase because you have an issue with 2% of them.

          • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You should think of a better comparison cause this one sucks.

            Also no. You’re doing something that affects 100% of users because the node these users use is malicious. The problem is the underlying structure not the people using said structure. Maybe this makes them stop using said structure.

            Its like being upset that I dont answer unknown numbers. “Well only 10% are scammers so you’re affecting 100% of calls”

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            This is like comparing requiring students in schools to wash their hands to genocide. The scale is the same but the impact is vastly different, and if you don’t want to wash hands (or be defederated) you can just move. Except for changing activitypub instances is even easier than changing schools and both are easier than leaving Palestine.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        it places one way mirror between us from which only they can see thru

        What do you mean by this? Even if Meta would collect data from defederated servers (I don’t think they would), it would be massively more complicated than if they were federated.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Federarting means there’s a two-way road between your instance and threads.net and traffic can flow both ways. When you defederate it stops the traffic flow from threads.net to you but the traffic from you to them is unchanged. Even if every single instance defederates them they can still see all the content that’s posted there. Nobody else just wont see any of theirs. Only your instance admins know your email, ip-address and so on but all your posts and messages are publicly available to anyone and you can’t stop them from accessing it.

          It’s basically the same thing as blocking an user. You wont no longer see their messages but they will see yours.

          EDIT: Turns out I was mistaken. Defederation indeed does stop the flow of data both ways.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            When you defederate it stops the traffic flow from threads.net to you but the traffic from you to them is unchanged.

            No, that is not how defederation works. One server defederates, traffic stops in both directions. It’s not comparable to user blocking.

            posts and messages are publicly available to anyone

            There’s a big difference between the posts being available publicly on the Web and them being sent to Threads via federation.

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              I hate to admit when I’ve been wrong but this seems to be one of those cases. I tried to use my lemmyNSFW account to view content on a instance that doesn’t federate with them and I indeed can’t see any. I stand corrected.

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Good on you for admitting it - we’re all wrong sometimes :) take it as a learning opportunity