Representative Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, told NBC News’ Kristen Welker on Sunday that according to lawyers hired by Congress, “at this point, there’s not a specific crime that’s been committed” by President Joe Biden in the impeachment probe against him.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Clinton did lie about his extramarital affairs

    not to Congress, and not under oath. Not technically.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        No, he didn’t tho.

        It’s history, and this is getting boring. He didn’t technically lie. You can post as many walls of text as you like, but you can’t change what happened.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          He did lie in every meaning of the word, and pretending he didn’t is some boomer head-in-the-sand bullshit.

          He said he didn’t touch her breasts, genitals, buttocks, or thighs while she was blowing him. She said he did grab those parts of her body while she was blowing him. He smoked cigars that had been inside of her, but he never touched her? Not once? Not a smack on the ass or a titty squeeze?

          Do you really believe that?

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            He did lie in every meaning of the word

            But not in the technical aspect as the republicans laid out in their definition while he was under oath.

            Look, you lost this argument the instant you began it, and every time you respond, I’m just gonna reply telling you that. Forever.

            Give. It. Up.

            You’re wrong.

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              He did lie in the technical aspect as the Republicans laid out in their definition while he was under oath. I’ve already demonstrated that. You haven’t made any argument other than “nuh uh” and you want to dance around like you won.

                • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  See, you think reality is an argument to win. You can have your opinions, but you don’t get your own facts. I don’t need to convince you.

                  • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Your type is so annoying.

                    “He lied to Congress!”

                    “No he didn’t, per the definition the Congress gave of the act, he didn’t lie.”

                    “But he did lie! To his family!”

                    “Doesn’t matter. We’re talking about lying to Congress, and he technically didn’t lie.”

                    “But he lied!”

                    “Nope.”

                    “Yes, he did!”

                    “Nope.”

                    “YES HE DID!”