• bort@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago
    1. Users are finally figuring out that some Linux distros are easy to use

    so recommending arch linux to newbies was counter productive all along?

    suprised_pikachu.bmp

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I refuse to accept that. The ArchWiki is super well documented, so there should be no issues for newbies!

      • bort@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, the arch wiki is very good and useful. The issue is, that you need the wiki in the first place. In a user-friendly distro everything would either work OOTB, or it could be done intuitively via GUI.

        how far can you get in arch without opening the terminal?

          • bort@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            also any beginner-friendly distro should be popular enough for the beginner to find it in the first place.

            (big exception: if it came pre-installed on their device)

      • bort@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        how far can you get with arch without opening the terminal or the wiki?

        • Spectrism@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          In my experience: As far as you can get with any other distro. What do you think Arch requires a terminal for? Genuine question.