• In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app’s founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What’s next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app’s founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle’s photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app’s full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Help me understand. You are saying there is absolutely no difference between a woman and a trans woman?

    • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They are saying that all women — cis and trans — are women. It doesn’t mean or imply that trans women and cis women have no differences.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              They are trying to say that cis and trans women both fall under the larger group known as women, they just don’t understand math.

              • JCreazy@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I know what they are trying to say, I just don’t think they realize that mathematically it doesn’t make sense.

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Could you explain what part of it doesn’t make sense to you? (Or what part you disagree with) Maybe one of us can clarify better if we start there