Crossposted because I think it’s an interesting take, but I don’t fully agree with the part about protests having no quantifiable goal.

Not all protests for Gaza were meant to gain engagement, many were organized to cause direct economic disruption to those that profit from the war, that is a goal.

https://www.a15action.com/

  • theluddite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    To be clear, I wasn’t advocating for organized violence as a good tactic. I was just picking a simple example.

    I still think that Bevins’s history and analysis has merit, even if you disagree with his conclusions. I’ve read at least two books by anarchists that put forth similar concepts of legibility: Graeber’s “Utopia of Rules” and James Scott’s “Seeing like a State” (which I actually read to write this post and have a bajillion opinions about, but that’s a post for another day). Regardless of your stance on whether your movement should or shouldn’t be legible, you have to understand legibility, both to the state, and to other capitalist powers like, say, social media (to pick one at random 😉 ).

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Indeed understanding legibility is important to become illegible. Which is exactly why Bevin’s interpretation is so incomplete and misguided. He genuinely seems to believe that this was a problem for these protests when in fact it was a defining feature that led to their (relative) success.