• whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, poor people and people living on minimum wage don’t need music. And if they really needed it, they would just skip a meal.

    Indexing and data hosting is worth $11 per month? Music uses very little space and bandwidth. Listening to 3 hours every day for a month ends up being around 10gb of bandwidth. If they were using expensive on-demand AWS bandwidth, that would cost them 50 cents. They aren’t, they have edge caches all over and almost certainly pay less than 10 cents.

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t… need… music…? There are plenty of free streaming options, or even the damn radio. Premium Spotify is far from the only option.

      Being able to listen to anything you want whenever you please is 100% a luxury – and one that wasn’t available until pretty recently.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As if piracy, free youtube etc. doesn’t exist. If you can’t afford 11$/mo and can’t afford to invest time to get around it then you really have bigger problems to complain about like lack of social security and wealth distribution. Complaining about this just appears like a comical waste of energy tbh.

      • gengar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everyone wants to listen to music illegally? And not everyone has unlimited data or can afford it for youtube/etc. Wealth distribution and a lack of social security are huge problems but like, bro it’s not a good look to criticize working class folks for (rightfully) complaining about yet another round of inflation.