Everyone knows alcohol is poison. Not many people know the side effects of drinking too much milk. You could actually become addicted to it and it would become a problem.
I had a friend who had some trouble with it, which is why I typed that comment.
We show the estimable rational addiction model tends to yield spurious evidence in favor of the rational addiction hypothesis when aggregate data are used. Direct application of the canonical model yields results seemingly indicative that non-addictive commodities such as milk, eggs, and oranges are rationally addictive.
This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It’s supposed to be ridiculous.
Yeah, this is a hella weird comment in an alcohol thread. That stuff is actually toxic, and popular mainly because of it.
Everyone knows alcohol is poison. Not many people know the side effects of drinking too much milk. You could actually become addicted to it and it would become a problem. I had a friend who had some trouble with it, which is why I typed that comment.
Source? Addictive milk is kind of “out of left field” for me.
https://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=nl&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=milk+addiction&oq=milk+addici#d=gs_qabs&t=1716051388232&u=%23p%3DcqatAO1BP1wJ
I don’t know how true this is, but I pulled this quote:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629604000414?casa_token=yJdjlqzU8HQAAAAA:12ChWBkGcBf2kQQDnvcMqXR5CS-MzAAaGgBxHL6ny7Q8G-et3dvnNvkuTrFtDwPMj0Lsz4bGkw
This is literally a study about how to get bad conclusions from this model of addiction. It’s supposed to be ridiculous.