• HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even highly automated, an idle future would mean no change.

    That would require essentially a perfect, and unchanging, society.

    That doesn’t sound realistic given our social nature.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Oh indeed. Like I stated, I doubt that many would take that option. Humans just tend to be too driven to do something to dedicate their lives to idleness. They would also likely feel social pressures to do otherwise. And when I say “idle”, I really mean it. It would take effort to avoid producing anything at all - not even art (Steevo and Bob in SLC Punk comes to mind).

      Would some be inclined to be idle? Probably. Would many want to spend their whole lives idle? The data does not suggest this.