• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not talking about drug harm reduction. I’m talking about the reduction of harm. Put another way, aiming to reduce the amount of harm your actions lead to.

    • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Put another way, aiming to reduce the amount of harm your actions lead to.

      well the good news is you can vote for anyone you actually want to take office, since only votes for bad people cause them to be elected.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a nice platitude, but there are only two outcomes, no matter how much you might wish there was a third. Your options are to help, abstain, or hurt. Abstaining means you’d rather not help, so again, in my mind, you’re a moron.

        Third party candidates are only viable when one of the major parties collapses, and the major parties only collapse when they consistently lose. So, if you actually want a viable third party, you should vote for the major party you dislike the least. Otherwise, you’re just perpetuating both.