As part of an analysis of how U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Judge Aileen Cannon, reports from her courtroom show a judge who is both “prickly” and" insecure" and often has trouble understanding what lawyers from both sides try to explain to her.

The controversial Cannon – who has been accused of slow-walking Donald Trump’s obstruction of justice trial related to his alleged illegal retention of government documents – in recent hearings has pressed lawyers to remake their points over and over, which led to the New York Times’ Alan Feuer to question whether, “she does not understand the answers she is receiving or is trying to push back against them.”

“Only the best,” am I right?

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    In a normal court, the justices are often held in high regard, whereby whomever appointed them is hardly even a factoid.

    The problem is that with Trump, he’s known for quid pro quo as well as just not even knowing the person. Odds are good that Bannon slipped her name to Trump and suddenly she’s “the most brilliant legal mind the nation has ever known. Just brilliant. Very smart.”

    Besides being nominated by Trump, I’m not sure if the prosecutors had any standing to have her recused.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not sure if the prosecutors had any standing to have her recused.

      Maybe not at the time, but how about now?

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      She was selected by the Federalist Society. Trump rubber stamped her (like he did the vast majority of appointments he made.)