I know memory is fairly cheap but e.g. there are millions of new videos on youtube everyday, each probably few hundred MBs to few GBs. It all has to take enormous amount of space. Not to mention backups.

  • patsharpesmullet@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s transposed on the fly, this is a fairly simple lambda function in AWS so whatever the GCP equivalent is. You can’t up sample potato spec, the reason it looks like shit is due to bandwidth and the service determining a lower speed than is available.

      • patsharpesmullet@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That response is almost 10 years old and completely outdated. I’ve designed and maintained a national media service and can confirm that on the fly transcoding is both cheaper and easier. It does make sense to store different formats of videos that are popular at the minute but in the medium to long term streams are transcoded.

        • mangomission@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure it’s old but the stats I posted in a lower comment show that at YouTube’s scale, it makes sense to store.