• Frokke@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is different. It’s genital mutilation. Has fuck all to do with gender affirmation

          • Corvidae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Circumcision (genital mutilation) on infants is widely practiced, thus logically it must be okay. This article asserts Biden says gender affirming surgery should be delayed until 18 years old (not okay on infants)

        • Frokke@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Please point out where I wrote anything remotely close to that. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

          • Yax@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I read that as not being directed at you but more as realisation that the state of things are even worse than suggested in the first comment.

            “Why is this specific gender affirming care ok but not the rest?”

            “That specific thing is actually mutilation”

            “So to THEM (not you) mutilation is ok but not gender affirming care(any at all)!”

          • Corvidae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Please point out where I used quotes and claimed you said it. Go ahead, I’ll wait.