More money in the pockets of entry-level workers sounds great, but Rachel Greszler of the conservative Heritage Foundation argues that such workers, and the economy writ large, are hurt more than helped by increases in the minimum wage.
You didn’t post proof, you posted a link you claim is proof but you can’t seem to quote which part is proof.
There are two possible reasons, one you are incredibly lazy, or two you know there is nothing to support your claim and decided to take claim some moral high ground as to why you won’t post the quote.
It’s not my job to read you a bedtime story, you’re a big boy. Do it yourself. I provided the information and it’s now on you to review it, or move on with your life. I really don’t care which.
It stated FDR choose to support a minimum wage bill of 0.25 over a 0.40 bill. That’s probably one of those pesky facts that you don’t want to post because it doesn’t support your position.
That single data point does not define the intent of the minimum wage itself. This is on you to prove.
Oh, also that article explains the 0.25 amount was a compromise wage to give the people something because Republicans wouldn’t support an actual living wage.
So even if you are right, it’s the Republican’s fault.
I provided two sources of information, you just don’t like them.
I will gladly join you in this circular argument as long as you want to stubbornly make it.
I have no idea why you are so afraid to post the quote.
Already posted proof, you didn’t like it, ping-pong back to you :>
You didn’t post proof, you posted a link you claim is proof but you can’t seem to quote which part is proof.
There are two possible reasons, one you are incredibly lazy, or two you know there is nothing to support your claim and decided to take claim some moral high ground as to why you won’t post the quote.
It’s not my job to read you a bedtime story, you’re a big boy. Do it yourself. I provided the information and it’s now on you to review it, or move on with your life. I really don’t care which.
More excuses. I did review it, which is why I trying to figure out what you think proves your point but you’re too lazy or scared to post it.
I guess you just didn’t comprehend what you read then, it was pretty simple. Not sure why you’re so confused by it.
It stated FDR choose to support a minimum wage bill of 0.25 over a 0.40 bill. That’s probably one of those pesky facts that you don’t want to post because it doesn’t support your position.
That single data point does not define the intent of the minimum wage itself. This is on you to prove.
Oh, also that article explains the 0.25 amount was a compromise wage to give the people something because Republicans wouldn’t support an actual living wage.
So even if you are right, it’s the Republican’s fault.
Better luck next time, Jimbo.