• theonetruedroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m happy to see this announcement. However, just transitioning to a non-profit does not make an organization good. They can still be greedy and take advantage of their user base. That being said, it seems Proton’s mission statement resonates with a non-profit type structure. When you are accountable to the shareholders, they become the priority.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      “don’t let perfect get in the way of good” or whatever that saying is. One step at a time, yeah?

      • j_elgato@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Perfect is the enemy of good.”

        Bad, also, is the enemy of good…

        I think maybe good walked into the wrong damn neighborhood.

    • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I remember right, OpenAi started with this model too, and they do lots of shady stuff. Not that this is the plan for Proton, but I completely agree that simply creating a nonprofit that owns the for profit brand doesn’t guarantee good behavior.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes Mozilla is a good example. They’re run like any other Silicon Valley company and spend more in C-suite develop their damn product.

      • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Bad example. There are plenty of non-profit FOSS services that do well and serve the community.

  • subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is definitely great news and refreshing to see from a company, but this came out two months ago.

    Published on June 17, 2024

    Edit: it looks like Proton just recently sent an email about this to their ProtonMail subscribers which is likely why this got posted just now.

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s refreshing to see in a world of ever increasing enshittification. Wish more companies move in this direction.

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think it might be because AI (aka LLMs) is genuinely useful when used properly.

        I use AI all the time to write emails. I give the LLM the email thread along with instructions like “I can’t make it Tuesday ask if they can do Wednesday at 2pm”

        The AI will write out an email that’s polite and relevant in context. Totally worth it.

        I think the problem is people/companies trying to shove LLMs where they don’t make sense.

        • plasticcheese@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I am not a fan of this. I see it all the time at work and it’s very obvious when someone has chatGPT write an email for them (it’s always such a sterile and yet overcomplicated writing style). If it’s a direct email to me, I tend to feel insulted that they couldn’t be bothered to write those 4 paragraphs themselves - it would have taken them 2 mins. There is a definite human disconnect going on in society at the moment, and its worrying.

          • Carrick1973@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I agree. I actually think it’s a net negative as well for friendships. As in the case of OP, I would rather get an original email from the sender saying they couldn’t make it, so let’s meet the next day, but instead I have to read thru several paragraphs of boilerplate and AI crap instead, which wastes my time, and I know the sender did it, so I’m mad at them for being impersonal. At some point, we’re just going to have people’s AI responding to each other without any person actually reading it.

            We’re only doing this because every company doesn’t want to be left behind so they go all in. It feels like Ian Malcolm said it best in Jurassic Park

            “Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should”

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Why not just write “I can’t make it Tuesday, can you do Wednesday at 2pm?”

          Otherwise we just end up in this world.

          • mholiv@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re not wrong but at least my emails will be taken seriously by some 60 year old company exec that’s still mad his secretary stopped printing his emails for him.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cool. I switched to Tuta because it fits my use case better (2 domains, one for my personal email and one for everything else). I don’t need any of the bells and whistles Proton has, and I also don’t want to pay extra to get more domains. The Tuta app kinda sucks, but it gets the job done. I’m hoping my wife and kids will be interested in private email, but they don’t seem to care, and I don’t think they’d like the tradeoffs.

    Now, if Proton revises their tiers, I might be interested. Give me something like the Tuta tiers, and I’ll probably switch to it. I prefer the UX of Proton, but $10/month is a bit steep for me, especially since I’m not going to use the other stuff they’re bundling in (I use Bitwarden for PW manager, have my own NAS, and I prefer Mullvad over Proton for VPN).

    That said, it’s super cool that they’re going non-profit. When that’s done, I’ll give it another look.

    • doctortran@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Problem with Tuta for me is its too closed off.

      Proton at least offers an IMAP bridge, Tuta utterly refuses to let you use your email outside their apps, which makes it more of a messaging app. And the fact there’s no way to export everything easily or even forward messages rubs me the wrong way. I tried them and have been using them for about 2 years but I’d definitely love to get away from it.

      I’m tired of these walled gardens. I don’t give a damn how secure it is, if I can’t leave it with my shit, then no thanks.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup, but only one custom domain. I really want at least two domains, one with tons of aliases for various accounts, and the other for personal communications. I could use a proton.me address for it, but then it becomes a huge pain to switch to another service should I need to.

    • Arn_Thor@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You say you use Bitwarden. Is that self hosted by any chance? If so, how do you handle the potential for an outage or server failure, where you’d presumably need some of the passwords to fix the problem in the first place.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Mine isn’t currently, but I’m working on it. The main complexity is that my wife and I share some passwords, and I want to make sure I do it properly so that transition is as smooth as possible. Vaultwarden is what you’d use to self-host.

        But as others have said, I’m really not worried about it. Passwords are cached locally and only touch the server when syncing to the server. I want to self-host to protect against breaches, not because I’m worried about connectivity loss.

        You can always backup your passwords (there’s an export feature) if you’re worried about it. I haven’t done it, but I imagine it wouldn’t be too hard to have a KeePass backup or something that you update manually every so often.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Bitwarden client has all the data cached, so the server can be down and you still get access to the passwords (same for internet connection).

        • Arn_Thor@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Thanks for the reply! That makes sense. I’m still weary of the client somehow losing the cache while the server is down (two holes in the Swiss cheese lining up) but that is overly paranoid I know that

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You should definitely be! I take backups every 6h for my self hosted vaultwarden (easier to manage and to backup, but not official, YMMV). You can also restore each backup automatically and have a “second service” you can run elsewhere (a standby basically), which will also ensure the backup works fine.

            I have been running bit/vaultwarden now for I think 6 years, for my whole family and I have never needed to do anything, despite having had a few hiccups with the server.

            Don’t take my word for it, but the clients (browser plugin, desktop app, mobile app) are designed to keep data locally I think. So the term cache might be misleading here because it suggests some temporary storage used just to save web requests, with a relatively quick expiration. In this case I think the plugin etc. can work potentially indefinitely without server - something to double-check, but I believe it’s the design.

            • Arn_Thor@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes, I figured the word “cache” was used loosely in this case. But you know, the server is down and/or irrecoverable for a while, and then one’s phone gets swiped. Not inconceivable. So I think I’ll follow some of the advice here about a backup service or password stash

  • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Of course it is good news, and I’m an happy Proton customer since over an year, but this Proton blog post dates back 2 months now…

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They just pushed an email announcement out, which is probably where OP heard about it.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They literally sent the email out within the last 36 hours. My work account got it this morning, and my personal last night.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And that makes it irrelevant because…? I’m a subscriber and I wasn’t aware of this until this post…

  • Unmapped@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is what made me finally completely switch my email and docs to proton. I’m so close to being able to delete my google account now.

    Well this and the docs live collaboration feature they recently added.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doesn’t really mean much to me, personally. OpenAI, Mozilla, RaspPi, and the NFL all did the same thing. Not until the entire company becomes a non-profit.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this going to be the same kind of non-profit as OpenAI? With a mission to improve the world? Yeah, let’s see how that goes. Another Proton marketing play on their set track to enshittification.

  • Baccata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Didn’t they get shit recently for AI and crypto related decisions ? Did they backtrack on that ?

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      How is this related to what the previous person said? Do you understand what “enshittification” is? Proton Wallet is an entirely separate application while the AI feature in Proton Mail is completely optional. Neither of these decisions have impacted the user experience of Proton customers.

      • asap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you understand what enshittification is? It’s a slow descent over a long period. You add optional, privacy-respecting AI now, and over time, (like a decade,) it becomes more shitty until eventually all your data is opted in to centralized data harvesting or wherever.

        I’m an Unlimited paid Proton user, and these new trend worry me too. Enshittification is a slow process. I watched Google turn from “Do no evil” to what they are today, and I’m too tired to want to watch the same entire process happen again to Proton.

    • Matt@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Proton is still a for-profit company and has shareholders who expect to to make money. The change is that the largest shareholder of the for-profit company is now a separate non-profit organization. It is still a positive move, but not entirely what the marketing makes it seem.

  • Eikov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If so, will they re-think tiers? Or maybe they could give the option for users to choose what they need exactly and what they’re willing to pay? (i.e current Proton plan that costs 8-12€ per month is too much for me, but I would gladly pay like 5€ monthly for little storage, VPN and few email aliases)

      • ccdfa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t think this plan supports P2P. You’re still on the free plan with the VPN.

        Edit: Looks like I was wrong. I remember needing to switch to a better plan to get the P2P but I guess I was wrong.

        Edit 2: There is some inconsistent information on the Proton site regarding what is included in each plan and this seems to be the source of our confusion in this thread.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Them holding a reserve of a cryptocurrency in case something happens to their financial accounts is not the same as peddling crypto.

      They’re not trying to sell you any. They’re not telling you that signing up to proton gets you “ProtonCoins” or something.

        • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          greed incentivizing unethical contraptions.

          Crypto is a tool, just like anything else. Is the internet a greed incentivizing unethical contraption? Because the internet spawned Google, Instagram, Facebook, 4Chan, and various other shady and illicit sites and services. Should we hate the internet because of this?

          Crypto isn’t inherently bad. It’s the people trying to take advantage and duplicate the “success” of Bitcoin that make crypto bad. I’m telling you this as a person who used to believe in “crypto” and was an early adopter.

          • Cynicus Rex@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            A hammer is a tool because no one but the hammer merchants gain financially if everyone were to buy a hammer. Crypto“currencies” are not purely tools but instead multi-level marketing pyramid Ponzi schemes because as soon as one has it they have everything to gain the more people buy it after them.

            “Thirdly, early adopters mine or buy large proportions of the total supply at negligible costs while late adopters mine or buy negligible proportions at large costs. It follows that holders immediately have every incentive to get as many people to buy after them. Like stocks? Like stocks, but without the dividends or anything tangible in the real world [10]. Congratulations, you got yourself a pyramid scheme †.”

            “† The stock market has largely become a pyramid/Ponzi scheme as well since most of the money does not exist and profits come from buyers or new entrants, i.e., the greater fool [16].” —Money corrupts; bitcoin corrupts absolutely, https://www.cynicusrex.com/file/cryptocultscience.html