Does AI actually help students learn? A recent experiment in a high school provides a cautionary tale.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania found that Turkish high school students who had access to ChatGPT while doing practice math problems did worse on a math test compared with students who didn’t have access to ChatGPT. Those with ChatGPT solved 48 percent more of the practice problems correctly, but they ultimately scored 17 percent worse on a test of the topic that the students were learning.

A third group of students had access to a revised version of ChatGPT that functioned more like a tutor. This chatbot was programmed to provide hints without directly divulging the answer. The students who used it did spectacularly better on the practice problems, solving 127 percent more of them correctly compared with students who did their practice work without any high-tech aids. But on a test afterwards, these AI-tutored students did no better. Students who just did their practice problems the old fashioned way — on their own — matched their test scores.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      “tests designed for use by people who don’t use chatgpt is performed by people who don’t”

      This is the same fn calculator argument we had 20 years ago.

      A tool is a tool. It will come in handy, but if it will be there in life, then it’s a dumb test

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The point of learning isn’t just access to that information later. That basic understanding gets built on all the way up through the end of your education, and is the base to all sorts of real world application.

        There’s no overlap at all between people who can’t pass a test without an LLM and people who understand the material.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also actual mathematicians are pretty much universally capable of doing many calculations to reasonable precision in their head, because internalizing the relationships between numbers and various mathematical constructs is necessary to be able to reason about them and use them in more than trivial ways.

          Tests for recall aren’t because the specific piece of information is the point. They’re because being able to retrieve the information is essential to integrate it into scenarios where you can utilize it, just like being able to do math without a calculator is needed to actually apply math in ways that aren’t prescribed for you.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        As someone who has taught math to students in a classroom, unless you have at least a basic understanding of HOW the numbers are supposed to work, the tool - a calculator - is useless. While getting the correct answer is important, I was more concerned with HOW you got that answer. Because if you know how you got that answer, then your ability to get the correct answer skyrockets.

        Because doing it your way leads to blindly relying on AI and believing those answers are always right. Because it’s just a tool right?