• Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    @zogwarg Actually, that part MIGHT be feasible: Nauru’s population is roughly 10,000 people, with GDP of roughly $10,000 per person. So if you had $10Bn to burn, you could offer *everyone* $1M in cash—equal to the average per capita income for a century.

    Given that Nauru’s going to be underwater if the Greenland ice sheet melts (in progress!) it’d be prudent of them to take the idiot’s money and leave.

    (On the other hand, even $1Bn would buy a LOT of Wagner Group murderers and rapists …)

    • zogwarg@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It seems that nauru is mostly a high plateau: topographical map here If the sea rises by more than 20m it’s certainly a scenario where 1M wouldn’t do you much good either way.

      EDIT: If I were a Nauru citizen I still wouldn’t sell, certainly not for such a low-ball offer ^^.

      EDIT2: Corrected 10K to 1M, not as awake as I thought. Maybe not such a low-ball offer, but it would still be a matter of principle to refuse such an offer, more on ethical/dignity grounds than financial ones, certainly I wouldn’t expect such a decision to be unanimous.

        • maol@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          My dad, who has been to Nauru, pointed out that Nauru has basically no arable land. So the survivalists would either have to somehow have food imported from the other .5% of humanity that survived climate change, or eat seagull. It’s very reminiscent of the Masque of the Red Death. I guess since they’re EA heads they’ll even be taking lots of recreational drugs and having sex parties.